Please send your test config
William R. Lorenz wrote:
> Mark & developers,
>
> I spent a few hours working on this issue today.
>
> I've seen a number of mailing list postings with no solution.
>
> With cfengine 3.0.5p1, the "corrupted in transit" problem presents when
> files are in Mac/UNIX
Mark & developers,
I spent a few hours working on this issue today.
I've seen a number of mailing list postings with no solution.
With cfengine 3.0.5p1, the "corrupted in transit" problem presents when
files are in Mac/UNIX format. After converting the .cf files to DOS
format, with 0x0d0a lin
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Help with basic cfengine topics
Author: mwlarsen
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17687,17707#msg-17707
neilhwatson Wrote:
---
> You are correct. I'm curious as to how someone
> with no prog
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Help with basic cfengine topics
Author: mwlarsen
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17687,17706#msg-17706
neilhwatson Wrote:
---
> The "edit_line => resolvconf" calls the agent
> bundle named 'r
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Help with basic cfengine topics
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17687,17705#msg-17705
You are correct. I'm curious as to how someone with no programming experience
finds his way to configuration management.
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Help with basic cfengine topics
Author: mwlarsen
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17687,17704#msg-17704
Ooh. I think I finally figured it out. Does @{checkresolver.resolvers}
contain the values in "resolvers" slist => { "128.39.89.10", "15
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Help with basic cfengine topics
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17687,17703#msg-17703
The "edit_line => resolvconf" calls the agent bundle named 'resolvconf'. This
is similar to a function or subroutine. Without any prog
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: signalling processes
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17696,17702#msg-17702
I too had to resort to using kill. On some systems this was less desirable
than a more graceful termination. For example on some AIX hosts the ki
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Help with basic cfengine topics
Author: mwlarsen
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17687,17701#msg-17701
My difficulty is that I don't understand what edit_line =>
resolvconf("iu.hio.no cfengine.com",@{checkresolver.resolvers}); and bundle
edi
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Help with basic cfengine topics
Author: mwlarsen
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17687,17700#msg-17700
Neil, I really appreciate you trying to explain this to me. It's obvious to my
non-programmer mind that there's a one-to-one correlation be
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: signalling processes
Author: mark
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17696,17699#msg-17699
Yes. It seems to capture the semantics better. I seem to have assumed that if
the signal failed to be sent it meant that the process no longer existed.
U
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: signalling processes
Author: Seva Gluschenko
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17696,17698#msg-17698
Perhaps, here conclusions may go unclear. For example, it would be reasonable
to send KILL only if process exists after TERM with certain delay
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: signalling processes
Author: mark
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17696,17697#msg-17697
src/unix.c DoAllSignals shows that the first signal that "succeeds" wins. This
is probably not the behaviour you want. I suggest removing the break and
c
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: signalling processes
Author: Seva Gluschenko
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17696,17696#msg-17696
Hello folks,
We've faced a problem trying to make a process to restart. According to the
reference, the following promise is expected to send TERM
14 matches
Mail list logo
