michoski wrote:
Hello
Can I just clarify something, although the master files are on NFS, they
are being served to the clients via cf-serverd. It is when cf-serverd
tries to access the NFS directory that I see issues.
Mark.
On 1/27/10 12:08 PM, "Mark Nelson" wrote:
Just a quick question
Mark Nelson writes:
> Just a quick question, I want to store the master policy files on an NFS
> share. When I do this I get key exchange issues. If I move the same
> files to local storage everything works. Is there any explicit code
> that stops the master policy files being stored on NFS?
On 1/27/10 12:08 PM, "Mark Nelson" wrote:
> Just a quick question, I want to store the master policy files on an NFS
> share. When I do this I get key exchange issues. If I move the same
> files to local storage everything works. Is there any explicit code
> that stops the master policy files b
Hello
Just a quick question, I want to store the master policy files on an NFS
share. When I do this I get key exchange issues. If I move the same
files to local storage everything works. Is there any explicit code
that stops the master policy files being stored on NFS?
Thanks
Mark.
_
On 1/27/10 7:04 AM, "B. Alexander" wrote:
> Here is the output of editfiles:
>
> *
> Main Tree Sched: editfiles pass 1 @ Wed Jan 27 09:31:23 2010
> *
>
> Begin
It is completely new.
M
Bas van der Vlies wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Just curious. I found in the cfengine.org site a link to a bug tracking
> system on cfengine.com. Is this bug tracking system used? Then it should also
> be easier to find it on the cfengine.com website.
>
> Another suggestion is
Mark,
Just curious. I found in the cfengine.org site a link to a bug tracking system
on cfengine.com. Is this bug tracking system used? Then it should also be
easier to find it on the cfengine.com website.
Another suggestion is a better Changelog. More detail what kind of bugs there
are fixe
Can you check this on a more recent version instead of pushing the work onto
us? Also,
please use the bug tracking, not the help discussion
nwat...@symcor.com wrote:
> Running Community 3.0.2 on Redhat 5.3, 32 bit.
>
> cf-promises -x in gdb
>
> Start was not at 31 -> 47
> -> BlockTextMatch -
Running Community 3.0.2 on Redhat 5.3, 32 bit.
cf-promises -x in gdb
Start was not at 31 -> 47
-> BlockTextMatch - ok
5. Testing promise attribute completeness
[New Thread 0xb7f3c6d0 (LWP 27088)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x08086dcb in cfPS (level=cf_error, status=119
Here is the output of editfiles:
*
Main Tree Sched: editfiles pass 1 @ Wed Jan 27 09:31:23 2010
*
Begin editing /etc/skel/.bashrc
End editing /etc/skel/.bashrc
help-cfengine-boun...@cfengine.org wrote on 2010-01-26 18:14:56:
>
> # "Live" .bashrc
> { home/.bashrc
> AppendIfNoSuchLine ". /etc/foo"
> }
What does verbose output say? I'm guessing that this promise will be
ignored since, being a relative path, Cf cannot determine where t
Or what I have done is to create a applescript with AppleScript Editor and
execute the script in cfengine like the following;
commands:
darwin::
"/usr/bin/osascript /tmp/applescript.scpt";
Cheers,
--Nakarin
On Jan 27, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Tim Cutts wrote:
>
> On 26 Jan 2010, at 8:11 pm, J
On 26 Jan 2010, at 8:11 pm, Janet Bass wrote:
> Has anyone used Applescripts scripts in cfengine?
>
> I am not finding a lot of documentation about Cfengine and Mac OS X
You can make applescripts trivially executable from the command line,
just like any shell script, so you should be able to r
And Jonathan is still standing, while the others are cowering in their corners!
(I shall investigate this idea. It seems like a good solution.)
-- the referee
> It is nice to be able to limit the frequency of updates (ie, via
> ifelapsed, if one has a separate promise in a "commands" section).
Hi Janet, cfengine supports all kinds of things on the Mac, but I have never
heard of
these scripts. I am not a Mac user myself, can you tell us about how they work?
How are
they different from a perl script, say? If they support the #! syntax then
there is
nothing to do, right? If they don't t
As far as I can see, these messages only occur in "inform" or "verbose" modes?
So get get what you ask for ;-)
Diego Zamboni wrote:
> No, the "problem" is that the host is down, but in this case I don't
> care. My definitions look like this:
>
>"phost" slist => { "192.168.58.133", "127.0.0.1
16 matches
Mail list logo
