[Health-dev] [bug #46666] Resize the party photo

Update of bug #4 (project health): Status: Ready For Test => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #2: Pushed in rev 682ec1

[Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #46665 (project health): The boolean proposal is semantically the same as mine to add a new option "Unknown" except that my solution doesn't add an extra field which should be tested all over the code before using the sex field. __

[Health-dev] [task #13769] Flexible name on party (person)

Follow-up Comment #13, task #13769 (project health): FYI, the Party.name in trunk is no more required. I think it is wrong to compute or hide the Party.name because this name could be different from any of the parts. Also I think we should add a deprecation warning on the usage of Party.lastname

[Health-dev] Bugtracker and mailing list

Hi, I find it very confusing that the bugs comments are posted on the mailing list. Because the bugtracker doesn't allow to answer by email, we got situation where an issue is discussed partially on a thread of the mailing list and partially on the bug tracker. So if someone looks at the bug histo

Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Hi Marc & team ! Oh long discussed GNU Health topic about sex, gender and uncertainty let me try to answer On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 18:30:10 -0500 Marc Murray wrote: > On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 11:21 +, Luis Falcon wrote: > > Follow-up Comment #1, bug #46665 (project health): > > > > Alt

[Health-dev] [task #13840] Change sex to gender

URL: Summary: Change sex to gender Project: GNU Health Submitted by: meanmicio Submitted on: Sun 13 Dec 2015 01:12:54 PM GMT Should Start On: Sun 13 Dec 2015 12:00:00 AM GMT Should be Fini

[Health-dev] [task #13840] Change sex to gender at party level

Update of task #13840 (project health): Release:None => 2.9.0 Summary:Change sex to gender => Change sex to gender at party level ___ Reply to this item at:

Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Dear Luis, On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 12:23 +, Luis Falcon wrote: > Let's not confuse the physical sex with legal or gender. This > issue has been brought up several times already, and I will change the > term "sex" for "gender" in the person (party) model. Whatever you do, please don't change

Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required (Marc Murray)

Dear All, Some interesting aspects here: http://itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2012/06/how-can-i-make-the-gender-question-on-an-application-form-more-inclusive/ This little write-up distinguishes the different perspectives of legal vs medical uses and offers some solutions. Cheers! Chris

[Health-dev] [task #13840] Change sex to gender at party level

Follow-up Comment #1, task #13840 (project health): I think this is a bad idea. Please don't. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Sav

[Health-dev] [task #13840] Change sex to gender at party level

Update of task #13840 (project health): Status:None => Ready For Test Percent Complete: 0% => 100% Assigned to:None => meanmicio __

Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Dear comunity 2015-12-13 8:20 GMT-05:00 Marc Murray : > Dear Luis, > > On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 12:23 +, Luis Falcon wrote: > > Let's not confuse the physical sex with legal or gender. This > issue has been brought up several times already, and I will change the > term "sex" for "gender" in the

Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Dear Comunity, I am adding the same comment on my last mail, since it wasnt correctly verified for my spelling 2015-12-13 9:19 GMT-05:00 Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto < carlos.sotelo.pi...@gmail.com>: > Dear comunity > > 2015-12-13 8:20 GMT-05:00 Marc Murray : > >> Dear Luis, >> >> On Sun, 2015-12

Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 08:20:49 -0500 Marc Murray wrote: > Dear Luis, > > On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 12:23 +, Luis Falcon wrote: > > > > Let's not confuse the physical sex with legal or gender. This > > issue has been brought up several times already, and I will change > > the term "sex" for "gend

[Health-dev] [task #13841] Automatic write of biological sex from neonatal info

URL: Summary: Automatic write of biological sex from neonatal info Project: GNU Health Submitted by: meanmicio Submitted on: Sun 13 Dec 2015 04:50:55 PM GMT Should Start On: Sun 13 Dec 2015 1

Re: [Health-dev] Access right for gnuhealth.patient.cage

On 2015-12-11 18:57, Luis Falcon wrote: > On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 00:01:08 +0700 > Cédric Krier wrote: > > > On 2015-12-11 16:40, Luis Falcon wrote: > > > > For the cage model, the problem is to define what is the default > > > > access right (for user without any group) and is there other group > >

[Health-dev] [task #13841] Automatic write of biological sex from neonatal info

Update of task #13841 (project health): Category:None => Data model Status:None => In Progress Percent Complete: 0% => 80% Assigned to:

[Health-dev] [task #13840] Change sex to gender at party level

Update of task #13840 (project health): Status: Ready For Test => Done ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Mes

[Health-dev] [task #13841] Automatic write of biological sex from neonatal info

Update of task #13841 (project health): Status: In Progress => Done Percent Complete: 80% => 100% ___ Follow-up Comment #2: Changeset : changes

[Health-dev] [task #13841] Automatic write of biological sex from neonatal info

Update of task #13841 (project health): Should be Finished on: Sun 13 Dec 2015 12:00:00 AM GMT => Sat 19 Dec 2015 12:00:00 AM GMT Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Health-dev] [task #13840] Change sex to gender at party level

Update of task #13840 (project health): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Mes

[Health-dev] [task #13769] Flexible name on party (person)

Follow-up Comment #14, task #13769 (project health): Hi Cedric ! It's great to know that the party name field is no longer required. As I suggested a while ago, we could use a functional field for the "text" field in the rec_name. For the party name, it can write the values of the given name o

[Health-dev] [task #13769] Flexible name on party (person)

Follow-up Comment #15, task #13769 (project health): I think it is too complex to use a function field, for me the Party.name is the official 'text' value. So it is better to just store it there instead of the list of PersonalName. ___ Repl