Follow-up Comment #14, task #13769 (project health):
Hi Cedric !
It's great to know that the party name field is no longer required.
As I suggested a while ago, we could use a functional field for the "text"
field in the rec_name.
For the party name, it can write the values of the given name on the
"official" type, but still would be hidden if we use the functional field.
On Sunday we should have online the testing version of the upcoming 3.0 on the
community server, so we can check how good/bad is the encoding time of the
name
Suggestions are welcome !
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?13769>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
