On 09/12/14 11:02, Luis Falcon wrote:
Hi Oscar and team !
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:34:05 -0500
Oscar Alvarez wrote:
On 08/12/14 04:35, Luis Falcon wrote:
Hi Chris !
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 19:49:00 -0800
Chris wrote:
I think there are reasons to develop both. With good, robust design
(like with
On 08/12/14 15:10, Cédric Krier wrote:
On 08 Dec 12:34, Oscar Alvarez wrote:
On 08/12/14 04:35, Luis Falcon wrote:
Hi Chris !
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 19:49:00 -0800
Chris wrote:
I think there are reasons to develop both. With good, robust design
(like with Bootstrap), webapp UX on a mobile devic
On 11 Dec 09:03, Oscar Alvarez wrote:
> On 08/12/14 15:10, Cédric Krier wrote:
> >Still HTML5 application is more portable. For example, I can not run
> >your test program on my FirefoxOS while I can run any HTML5 application.
> >And I think FirefoxOS is realy an important target for GNU Healt as i
On 11/12/14 09:45, Cédric Krier wrote:
On 11 Dec 09:03, Oscar Alvarez wrote:
On 08/12/14 15:10, Cédric Krier wrote:
Still HTML5 application is more portable. For example, I can not run
your test program on my FirefoxOS while I can run any HTML5 application.
And I think FirefoxOS is realy an im
+1 from Laos.
On Dec 11, 2014 11:28 PM, "Oscar Alvarez"
wrote:
>
> On 11/12/14 09:45, Cédric Krier wrote:
>
>> On 11 Dec 09:03, Oscar Alvarez wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/12/14 15:10, Cédric Krier wrote:
>>>
Still HTML5 application is more portable. For example, I can not run
your test program o
On 11 Dec 11:28, Oscar Alvarez wrote:
>
> On 11/12/14 09:45, Cédric Krier wrote:
> >On 11 Dec 09:03, Oscar Alvarez wrote:
> >>On 08/12/14 15:10, Cédric Krier wrote:
> >>>Still HTML5 application is more portable. For example, I can not run
> >>>your test program on my FirefoxOS while I can run any
