[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Trezzo resolved HDFS-17404.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Add Namenode info to log message when setting block keys from active
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Trezzo resolved HDFS-17332.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> DFSInputStream: avoid logging stacktrace until when we really need to fai
+1
I helped deploy and run the ATSv2 aux service on a cluster with ~400 node
managers on it. I also verified that ATSv2 has no significant impact when
disabled.
Nice work everyone!
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Aaron Gresch wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> I did some testing with security off ru
Thanks Sangjin for pushing this forward! I have a few questions:
1. What is the definition of end-of-life for a release in the hadoop
project? My current understanding is as follows: When a release line
reaches end-of-life, there are no more planned releases for that line.
Committers are no longer
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for cutting another release candidate Sangjin!
1. Diff'ed the CHANGES-*.txt files against the branch-2.6.5 git log and
verified the set of listed issues matches.
2. Verified md5 checksums and signature on src and binary tar.gz.
3. Built from source.
4. Started up a pseudo
pachehadoop-1048/
> .
> >
> > You can find my public key at
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS.
> >
> > Please try the release and vote. The vote will run for the usual 5 days.
> > Huge thanks to Chris T
h shortly after that. If you have any critical
>> change that should be made part of 2.6.5 (CVE patches included), please
>> reach out to us and commit the changes. If all things go well, we'd like to
>> cut the branch in a few days.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sangjin
volunteer to backport one of the issues.
As always, please let me know if you have any questions or feel that I have
missed something.
Thank you!
Chris Trezzo
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
> > On Aug 12, 2016, at 8:19 AM, Junping Du wrote:
> &g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Trezzo resolved HDFS-9028.
Resolution: Won't Fix
The original motivation for creating these accessor methods is no longer
when we release 2.6.5.
As always, please let me know if I have missed something.
Thanks!
Chris Trezzo
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> Since there is sufficient interest in 2.6.5, we should probably do it. All
> the reasons Allen outlines make sense.
>
&g
son that HADOOP-13362 is not needed for branch-2.6
> unless we backport container metrics related patches there.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Junping
> ________
> From: Jason Lowe
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:14 PM
> To: Chris Trez
s that you think I have missed. This was just an
initial high-level triage, so there could definitely be issues that are
miss-labeled.
As a side note: we still need to look at the pre-commit build for 2.6 and
follow up with an addendum for HADOOP-12800.
Thanks everyone!
Chris Trezzo
finitely 2.7.3 as it stands
> today.
>
> +Vinod
>
>
> > On Apr 1, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Chris Trezzo wrote:
> >
> > A few thoughts:
> >
> > 1. To echo Andrew Wang, HDFS-8578 (parallel upgrades) should be a
> > prerequisite for HDFS-8791. Without that pa
A few thoughts:
1. To echo Andrew Wang, HDFS-8578 (parallel upgrades) should be a
prerequisite for HDFS-8791. Without that patch, upgrades can be very slow
for data nodes depending on your setup.
2. We have already deployed this patch internally so, with my Twitter hat
on, I would be perfectly ha
Chris Trezzo created HDFS-9922:
--
Summary: Upgrade Domain placement policy status marks a good block
in violation when there are decommissioned nodes
Key: HDFS-9922
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS
Thanks Junping for the clarification! It was not my intention to violate
the rules. I would be happy to work with you and help you manage the
release in whatever way is most effective.
Chris
On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Junping Du wrote:
> Thanks Chris Trezzo for volunteer on helping 2.
Hi Sangjin,
I would be happy to volunteer to work with you as a release manager for
2.6.3. Shooting for a time in early December seems reasonable to me. I also
agree that if we miss that window, January would be the next best option.
Thanks,
Chris
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Sangjin Lee wr
Chris Trezzo created HDFS-9028:
--
Summary: Create accessor methods for DataNode#data and
DataNode#isBlockTokenEnabled
Key: HDFS-9028
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9028
Project: Hadoop
Chris Trezzo created HDFS-9008:
--
Summary: Balancer#Parameters class could use a builder pattern
Key: HDFS-9008
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9008
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue
Chris Trezzo created HDFS-8923:
--
Summary: Add -source flag to balancer usage message
Key: HDFS-8923
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8923
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Sub
Chris Trezzo created HDFS-8890:
--
Summary: Allow admin to specify which blockpools the balancer
should run on
Key: HDFS-8890
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8890
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Chris Trezzo created HDFS-8789:
--
Summary: Block Placement policy migrator
Key: HDFS-8789
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8789
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: New Feature
I would like to see the shared cache (YARN-1492) make it in as well. We are
going through the final review process (with Karthik and Vinod) and should
be fairly close to complete. This is another feature that has been under
development for a while.
Thanks,
Chris
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:00 PM, S
23 matches
Mail list logo
