Thanks Junping for the clarification! It was not my intention to violate the rules. I would be happy to work with you and help you manage the release in whatever way is most effective.
Chris On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Thanks Chris Trezzo for volunteer on helping 2.6.3 release. I think > Sangjin was asking for a committer to serve as release manager for 2.6.3 > according to Apache rules: > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html. > I would like to serve as that role to work closely with you and Sangjin on > 2.6.3 release if no objects from others. > > Thanks, > > Junping > ________________________________________ > From: Chris Trezzo <ctre...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 1:13 AM > To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org <javascript:;> > Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org <javascript:;>; > hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org <javascript:;>; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org > <javascript:;> > Subject: Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x > > Hi Sangjin, > > I would be happy to volunteer to work with you as a release manager for > 2.6.3. Shooting for a time in early December seems reasonable to me. I also > agree that if we miss that window, January would be the next best option. > > Thanks, > Chris > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > I'd like to pick up this email discussion again. It is time that we > started > > thinking about the next release in the 2.6.x line. IMO we want to walk > the > > balance between maintaining a reasonable release cadence and getting a > good > > amount of high-quality fixes. The timeframe is a little tricky as the > > holidays are approaching. If we have enough fixes accumulated in > > branch-2.6, some time early December might be a good target for cutting > the > > first release candidate. Once we miss that window, I think we are looking > > at next January. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. > > > > It'd be good if someone can volunteer for the release manager for 2.6.3. > > I'd be happy to help out in any way I can. Thanks! > > > > Regards, > > Sangjin > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Vinod Vavilapalli < > > vino...@hortonworks.com <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Just to stress on the following, it is very important that any critical > > > bug-fixes that we push into 2.8.0 or even trunk, we should consider > them > > > for 2.6.3 and 2.7.3 if it makes sense. This is the only way we can > avoid > > > extremely long release cycles like that of 2.6.1. > > > > > > Also, to clarify a little, use Target-version if you want a discussion > of > > > the backport, but if you do end up backporting patches after that, you > > > should set the fix-version to be 2.6.1. > > > > > > Thanks > > > +Vinod > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 2, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > As you may have seen, 2.6.2 is out > > > > <http://markmail.org/thread/yw53xgz6wzpqnclt>. I have also > retargeted > > > all > > > > open issues that were targeted for 2.6.2 to 2.6.3. > > > > > > > > Continuing the discussion in the email thread here > > > > <http://markmail.org/thread/ofjlzurok223bzyi>, I'd like us to > maintain > > > the > > > > cadence of monthly point releases in the 2.6.x line. It would be > great > > if > > > > we can have 2.6.3 released before the year-end holidays. > > > > > > > > If you have any bugfixes and improvements that are targeted for 2.7.x > > (or > > > > 2.8) that you think are applicable to 2.6.x, please *set the target > > > version > > > > to 2.6.3* and merge them to branch-2.6. Please use your judgment in > > terms > > > > of the applicability and quality of the changes so that we can ensure > > > each > > > > point release is consistently better quality than the previous one. > > > Thanks > > > > everyone! > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Sangjin > > > > > > > > >
