[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aaron T. Myers resolved HDFS-3117.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Hi cldoltd, please post your question to common-u...@hadoop.apache.org. JIRA
clean cache and can't start hadoop
--
Key: HDFS-3117
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3117
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: cldoltd
i use command cache >3 /proc/sys/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4212/#review6103
---
Real close now!
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/ap
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> I am sure Jitendra understands what Todd meant, given he was quite involved
> in the work. As Jitendra said, I would like to keep the wire type from the
> implementation type. Even for internal protocols. Rolling upgrades is
> important.
H
Typo in fetchdt error message
-
Key: HDFS-3116
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3116
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Components: hdfs client
Affects Versions: 0.24.0
R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uma Maheswara Rao G resolved HDFS-3091.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE
Target Version
Update hdfs design doc to consider HA NNs
-
Key: HDFS-3115
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3115
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Components: documentation
Affects Vers
Remove implementing Writable interface for the internal data types in HDFS
--
Key: HDFS-3114
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3114
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Is
I am sure Jitendra understands what Todd meant, given he was quite involved
in the work. As Jitendra said, I would like to keep the wire type from the
implementation type. Even for internal protocols. Rolling upgrades is
important.
I understand where Todd is coming from. We did this work for 10 pr
Exactly. We still have wire compatibility, we just avoid the redundant
work of wrapping the whole thing.
-Todd
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Robert Evans wrote:
> I think what we are talking about here is removing some of the extra layers
> of abstraction in java. The wire protocol used wil
httpfs does not support delegation tokens
-
Key: HDFS-3113
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3113
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 0.23.3
Rep
I think what we are talking about here is removing some of the extra layers of
abstraction in java. The wire protocol used will be identical in either case.
It is just that we would have to use the Protocol Buffer Builder APIs instead
of wrapping them with our own custom getters/setters.
I am
Wire compatibility in hdfs private protocols between different
components is also important for rolling upgrades. We do want to support
upgrading different components of a cluster independent of each other and
wire compatibility is one of the essential prerequisites. Therefore, even
if some prot
13 matches
Mail list logo
