[jira] Created: (HDFS-1601) Pipeline ACKs are sent as lots of tiny TCP packets

2011-01-26 Thread Todd Lipcon (JIRA)
Pipeline ACKs are sent as lots of tiny TCP packets -- Key: HDFS-1601 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1601 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Improvement Components: data

[jira] Created: (HDFS-1600) editsStored.xml cause release audit warning

2011-01-26 Thread Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)
editsStored.xml cause release audit warning --- Key: HDFS-1600 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1600 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Bug Components: build, test Re

[jira] Created: (HDFS-1599) Umbrella Jira for Improving HBASE support in HDFS

2011-01-26 Thread Sanjay Radia (JIRA)
Umbrella Jira for Improving HBASE support in HDFS - Key: HDFS-1599 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1599 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Sanjay

[jira] Created: (HDFS-1598) ListPathsServlet excludes .*.crc files

2011-01-26 Thread Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE (JIRA)
ListPathsServlet excludes .*.crc files -- Key: HDFS-1598 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1598 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.20.2 Reporter: Tsz Wo

Re: Use VIP for DataNodes

2011-01-26 Thread mac fang
Hi, dhruba, Thanks for sharing. Seems we only need to let NameNode & Backup Node in the same subnet. Why it is a main problem? regards macf On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Harsh J wrote: > Thank you for correcting that :) > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Dhruba Borthakur > wrote: > > Fb

Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk - Build # 563 - Still Failing

2011-01-26 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk/563/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 647053 lines...] [junit] 2011-01-26 12:43:46,84

Re: Use VIP for DataNodes

2011-01-26 Thread Harsh J
Thank you for correcting that :) On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote: > Fb does not use the VIP approach, we tried that but quickly found out some > limitations, one main problem being that the failover server pair has to be > in the same subnet (for VIP to work). Instead we