Thank you for correcting that :) On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Dhruba Borthakur <dhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fb does not use the VIP approach, we tried that but quickly found out some > limitations, one main problem being that the failover server pair has to be > in the same subnet (for VIP to work). Instead we now use the AvatarNode > integrated with Zookeeper. > > -dhruba > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Harsh J <qwertyman...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is a good approach, is used by many to mask the NameNode address >> for the DataNodes; and is also good to use while using BackupNode >> (Even Facebook does this). >> >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:38 AM, mac fang <mac.had...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi, guys, >> > >> > Do we have any plan to enable VIP between NameNode and DataNodes, I mean >> > multiple NameNodes and we use a VIP stands before the NNs. Then DNs only >> > need to connect to the VIP. I don't know if it is valuable we have this >> impl >> > in our hdsf and if there has any issues? >> > >> > Any hints are valuable for me. :) >> > >> > regards >> > macf >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Harsh J >> www.harshj.com >> > > > > -- > Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba >
-- Harsh J www.harshj.com
