Thanks to Marcos Gambeta for his exciting and inspiring works
HB QT is a Great Milestone for harbour comunity now we will able
develop state-of-the-art graphical user interfaces for harbour, and
easily port them to new platforms
Harbour and QT are either Mature,Modern,Portable,Efficient and the
Revision: 10651
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10651&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-03-19 08:14:22 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-19 09:10 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* bin/postinst.bat
- Re
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Edmer wrote:
Hi,
> Is this a confirmed bug ?
> >> dbskip(0) will move the record pointer to phantom record (honoring the
> >> scope). other RDDS don't do that
It's cause by ADS behavior.
> >> #include "ads.ch"
> >> proc main()
> >> rddregister( "ADS", 1 )
Not necessary fro
I'm using
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu
4.3.3-5ubuntu4' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --lib
Hi All,
I've 'ported' these xhb files to the state where they compile without
warnings/errors:
xhb/hbserv.c
xhb/trpc.prg
xhb/trpccli.prg
xhb/ttable.prg
I don't know if they work. One piece is definitely missing: hbsrlraw.c,
but this file need some additional rework to avoid internals, it also
uses
Yes Chen! And not only that, but I'm also finishing a series of
articles and tutorials to put on the site. Already the weekend this
will be updated with new content.
Vailton Renato
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour
Just few notes:
1 - include path is /usr/include/qt4
2 - #include should use /
3 - ‘class QDialog’ has no member named
‘open’ hbqt_qdialog.cppharbour/contrib/hbqtline 122C/C++
Problem
method open is only in qt4.5
I think it's better to state that hbqt requires qt4.5.
St
Thanks for the corrections.
Yes, obviously we don't want to focus on supporting older versions due the
licensing. (well, technically we could, but
it isn't worth the effort as I doubt users would use this lib for open
source development, nor do I think many would
like to buy a license).
I guess i
Good news
2009/3/19 Vailton Renato :
> Yes Chen! And not only that, but I'm also finishing a series of
> articles and tutorials to put on the site. Already the weekend this
> will be updated with new content.
>
> Vailton Renato
> ___
> Harbour mailing li
Found it, don't bother.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Thanks for the corrections.
>
> Yes, obviously we don't want to focus on supporting older versions due the
> licensing. (well, technically we could, but
> it isn't worth the effort as I doubt users would use this l
Revision: 10652
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10652&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-03-19 11:28:18 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-19 12:27 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* contrib/xhb/Makefile
+
Hi,
Setup your Harbour build environment and issue the
'make' or 'mingw32-make' command in the hbwhat dir.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Claudio G Torrillo
wrote:
> Sorry, but of course age does not come alone. ;)
>
>
>
> >> you can build it using the GNU Make system.
>
>
>
>
Revision: 10653
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10653&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-03-19 11:59:40 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-19 12:58 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* config/rules.cf
% Rem
Sorry, but of course age does not come alone. ;)
>> you can build it using the GNU Make system.
I do not understand how to apply the GNU Make system.
There are some instructive?
Could someone tell me how to do it?
TIA.
Claudio Torrillo
De: harbour-boun...@harbour-project.o
Here is mine, just for fun :) [ BTW, Chen, you'd wonder how much faster
Harbour would be with MSVC or MinGW. ]
For sure Clipper is slower, and this can be felt when running
my real-life app. I blamed console output, but it seems it's not just
that. By dropping legacy stuff and using new Harbour te
From: Viktor Szakáts [mailto:harbour...@syenar.hu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 2:39 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Speedtest results
Here is mine, just for fun :)
Hi Marek,
Yes, I've run tests ST and MT with pocc, ow, bcc, mingw and
icc for comparison,
also included previous Clipper, xpp and xhb tests.
Get them here:
http://www.syenar.hu/harbour/winbench.zip
Machine:
P4 2.6 HT 3GB RAM. No other apps running.
Command lines:
hbmk2 speedtst.prg -gc3 -mt -ospe
Intresting
in Multi Thread mode these are ranking (harbour vs xbase++)
Compilertime
mt-hb-icc intel 48,22
mt-hb-msvc microsoft 49,66
mt-hb-mingw43256,94
mt-hb-mingw43257,02
mt-hb-bcc borland 64,47
mt-hb-ppoc pelles 69,09
mt-hb-ow w
Additional information, ranks by executable size in KB, plus some
conclusions:
st-c52bli271
st-hb-msvc 566
mt-hb-msvc 586
st-hb-bcc629
mt-hb-bcc652
st-hb-pocc 669
mt-hb-pocc 695
st-hb-ow 760
mt-hb-ow 807
st-hb-icc811
mt-hb-icc
Hello Viktor
I have put in batch file:
set HB_INC_QT=C:\devl\Qt\2009.01\qt\include
set HB_DIR_QT=C:\devl\Qt\2009.01\qt
But the make system does not enter contrib/hbqt.
Do I have to build it separately? If yes, what minimum
I have to do ?
Also you have specified in
hbq_base.cpp
but I do n
Hi Pritpal,
I have put in batch file:
>
> set HB_INC_QT=C:\devl\Qt\2009.01\qt\include
> set HB_DIR_QT=C:\devl\Qt\2009.01\qt
>
> But the make system does not enter contrib/hbqt.
That's just generic configuration, for now only the
first line is important and hbqt is fully left out of the
default b
Revision: 10654
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10654&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-03-19 14:34:33 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-19 15:33 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* INSTALL
* contrib/Makef
Hi Viktor,
To be concluded from your ranks is that POCC is indeed more intersting than
BCC; is POCC the same as Pelles ISO C Compiler 2.70
On their website there's only a download for version 5.00.1 - am i missing sth?
best regards,
frank
- Original Message -
From: Viktor Szaká
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> 2009-03-19 12:58 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
> * config/rules.cf
> % Removed -ko option as it slightly decreases performance in -gc3 mode.
> (it's better in -gc[0-2] only)
Viktor,
Please compile speedtst wi
Hi Frank,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:44 PM, frank van nuffel <
clipper5_...@versateladsl.be> wrote:
> To be concluded from your ranks is that POCC is indeed more intersting
> than BCC; is POCC the same as Pelles ISO C Compiler 2.70
> On their website there's only a download for version 5.00.1 - am
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Enrico Maria Giordano
wrote:
> How about the function hb_mouse_Col()? I don't know what it is for but an
> italian colleague is trying to use it and get unresolved external.
Could it be hb_mouseCol()?
Here are the hb_mouseXYZ funcs I found:
extern HB_EXPORT BOO
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Viktor Szakáts"
A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Data invio: giovedì 19 marzo 2009 15.09
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] Speedtest results
POCC can also generate proper .dlls, so it clearly
wins over BCC.
I don't know what do you exactly mean with "prop
I propose to renato copy this post in harbour website
so it will be intresting for all harbour newbbies
2009 Speed Comparision
2009/3/19 Viktor Szakáts :
> Additional information, ranks by executable size in KB, plus
> some conclusions:
> st-c52bli 271
> st-hb-msvc 566
> mt-hb-msvc
Thank you, Viktor, for confirming
btw, my ISP account will expire within a few days, and i will unsubscribe from
the Harbour list, for perhaps a year or longer, to remain offline; meanwhile i
wish everyone here even more success with the results that are now already
excellent;
take care and
>
> POCC can also generate proper .dlls, so it clearly
>> wins over BCC.
>>
>
> I don't know what do you exactly mean with "proper .dlls" but I have no
> problem to make DLLs using BCC.
Proper means exported symbols don't have a Borland proprietary
underscore prepended to them.
If you stay insid
How about the function hb_mouse_Col()? I don't know what it is for but an
italian colleague is trying to use it and get unresolved external.
EMG
--
EMAG Software Homepage: http://www.emagsoftware.it
The EMG's ZX-Spectrum Page: http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
The Best of Spectrum Games:
>
> btw, my ISP account will expire within a few days, and i will unsubscribe
> from the Harbour list, for perhaps a year or longer, to remain offline;
> meanwhile i wish everyone here even more success with the results that are
> now
>
I envy you :)
> already excellent;
>
take care and all the
Revision: 10655
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10655&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2009-03-19 15:18:05 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-19 08:10 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* harbour/contrib/hbqt/hbqt.h
Hi,
or could it be MCol() as from CA Clipper 5.3 and as defined in
harbour/source/rtl/mouse53.c ?
Other mouse functions are:
MPRESENT
MHIDE
MSHOW
MSETCURSOR
MROW
MSETPOS
MLEFTDOWN
MRIGHTDOWN
MDBLCLK
MSAVESTATE
MRESTSTATE
MSETBOUNDS
HB_MMIDDLEDOWN
Obviously they are redirected to below harbour f
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Viktor Szakáts"
A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Data invio: giovedì 19 marzo 2009 16.15
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] Speedtest results
Proper means exported symbols don't have a Borland proprietary
underscore prepended to them.
If you stay inside the
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Lorenzo Fiorini"
A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Data invio: giovedì 19 marzo 2009 16.04
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] hb_mouse_Col()
Could it be hb_mouseCol()?
Most likely, thank you.
EMG
--
EMAG Software Homepage: http://www.emagsoftware.it
T
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Enrico Maria Giordano
wrote:
> Most likely, thank you.
I've also found this:
2007-12-07 10:43 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/include/hbgtcore.h
* harbour/source/rtl/hbgtcore.c
* harbour/source/rtl/gtapi.c
* harbour/source/
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Francesco Saverio Giudice"
A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Data invio: giovedì 19 marzo 2009 16.19
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] hb_mouse_Col()
Hi,
or could it be MCol() as from CA Clipper 5.3 and as defined in
harbour/source/rtl/mouse53.c ?
No, I'm
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Lorenzo Fiorini"
A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Data invio: giovedì 19 marzo 2009 16.31
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] hb_mouse_Col()
I've also found this:
Thank you.
EMG
--
EMAG Software Homepage: http://www.emagsoftware.it
The EMG's ZX-Spectr
Revision: 10656
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10656&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2009-03-19 16:20:04 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-19 09:20 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* harbour/contrib/hbqt/hbqt.h
Hi
C:\harbour\source\vm\maindllp>if not exist ..\..\..\lib\win\msvc\. md
..\..\..\lib\win\msvc
make.exe[4]: Entering directory `C:/harbour/source/vm/maindllp/win/msvc'
cl.exe -nologo -W4 -wd4127 -Gs -I. -I../../../../../include -TP -Ot2b1
-EHs-c- -MT -DHB_DYNLIB -c ../../../maindllp.c -Fomain
How using hashes or other technique you have the smallest startup
times with harbour compiled app?
Probably do you use msvc as compiler because it generate smallest and
fastest executable
2009/3/18 Viktor Szakáts :
> Here is mine, just for fun :) [ BTW, Chen, you'd wonder how
> much faster Harbour
Revision: 10657
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10657&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-03-19 17:08:33 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-19 18:06 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* source/vm/maindll.c
* s
Hi Przemyslaw Czerpak
I would like to make a suggestion for the function dTOc (), a second
parameter with the output format, something like this:
? dtoc (date (), "MM-DD-)
? dtoc (date (), "MM-)
? dtoc (date (), "-DD)
I did this on xHarbour, follows the source:
#pragma BEGINDUMP
#
>
> How using hashes or other technique you have the smallest startup
> times with harbour compiled app?
> Probably do you use msvc as compiler because it generate smallest and
> fastest executable
Yes, I'm using MSVC on Windows, with MinGW as a backup.
The other question is very generic and rea
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Mario Simoes Filho wrote:
Hi,
> I would like to make a suggestion for the function dTOc (), a second
> parameter with the output format, something like this:
> ? dtoc (date (), "MM-DD-)
> ? dtoc (date (), "MM-)
> ? dtoc (date (), "-DD)
I already added such param
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi,
> ---
> 2009-03-19 18:06 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
> * source/vm/maindll.c
> * source/vm/maindllp.c
> ! Fixed placement of HB_EXPORT in declaration.
Which compiler needs separate declaration for D
I've added it for one of them... maybe it was ICC, or MSVC, otherwise it
warned that the entry point won't be exported.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > ---
> > 2009-03-19 1
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
> I've added it for one of them... maybe it was ICC, or MSVC, otherwise it
> warned that the entry point won't be exported.
OK. Only one note:
BOOL HB_EXPORT WINAPI DllEntryPoint( HINSTANCE hInstance, DWORD fdwReason,
PVOID pvReserved );
always add
Thanks for your notes.
I'll move HB_EXPORT to the beginning of declaration.
Truth is that I totally forgot which scenario and which
compiler was the complaining one, so I cannot test
if HB_EXPORT is enough in the definition. I remember
the warning said that a 'declaration' was missing, so
that's w
Revision: 10658
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10658&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-03-19 18:13:33 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-19 19:05 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* source/vm/maindll.c
* s
Revision: 10659
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10659&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-03-19 18:50:21 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-19 19:49 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* xhb/Makefile
* xhb/dump
Revision: 10660
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10660&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-03-19 19:37:56 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-19 20:37 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* contrib/xhb/Makefile
+
Hi Claudio,
BTW, we can copy lighter functions from hbwhat to
hbwin (which is Harbour's official Windows lib), just
post the functions you'd need.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Hi,
> Setup your Harbour build environment and issue the
> 'make' or 'mingw32
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi Viktor,
> Attached the -gc2 results. Notice that the results aren't
> suited for -ko comparison as I've used different revisions.
> I hope this wasn't your goal. If it was I can redo -gc3
> tests with current build (-ko disabled).
Thank you very much
>
> > Attached the -gc2 results. Notice that the results aren't
> > suited for -ko comparison as I've used different revisions.
> > I hope this wasn't your goal. If it was I can redo -gc3
> > tests with current build (-ko disabled).
>
> Thank you very much for test but I asked about reverted test.
Revision: 10661
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10661&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-03-19 23:42:42 + (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-03-20 00:41 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
+ contrib/xhb/inet.h
+
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
> > Thank you very much for test but I asked about reverted test. I want to
> > compare harbour-gc2 + speedtst-gc2 with harbour-gc3 + speedtst-gc2.
> > Can you send also harbour-gc3 + speedtst-gc2.
> Sorry, I didn't explain the filenames:
> Harbour -gc3 +
>
> > Sorry, I didn't explain the filenames:
> > Harbour -gc3 + speedtst -gc2 (yesterday's builds):
> >st-hb-icc-gc2.txt
> >st-hb-msvc-gc2.txt
> >st-hb-mingw433-gc2.txt
> > Harbour -gc2 + speedtst -gc2 (recent builds):
> >st-hb-msvc-gc2-gc2.txt
> >st-hb-mingw433-gc2-gc2.txt
>
>
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
> > I can believe in many different things but I do not belive that:
> > 03/19/09 23:05:24 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3
> > Harbour-gc2+speedtst-gc2 gives:
> > [ T000: empty loop overhead ]...0.06
> > Harbour-gc3
>
> > In this specific test (and only this one, it was the last one),
> > I was impatient and run the test while the last part of the
> > build process (zip.exe) didn't end yet. And you spotted it.
> > So I've rerun this test, see it at the end of this mail. Don't
> > discredit the rest of the resu
61 matches
Mail list logo
