[Harbour] Re: Harbour under Mandriva 2008

2008-03-27 Thread David Arturo Macias Corona
>> Error DBFCDX/1004 Create error: /mnt/win_d/dat\sggopera.dbf;(Error >DOS 13) >Exactly. It was a bug which still exist in xHarbour and in Harbour >it was fixed. It was not possible to use "\" in files names in *nixes. >Now it it. Checked. Mandriva 2008 support "\" in file names, for example

[Harbour] Re: Harbour under Mandriva 2008

2008-03-27 Thread David Arturo Macias Corona
>What exactly is purpose/mean of SET DIRSEPARATOR ( set(104) ) ? >By default is OS_PATH_DELIMITER >That mean set( 104, "\" ) translate \ to / on file operations ? Przemek: Forget response From ChangeLog: 2002-09-23 11:00 UTC-0300 Gustavo Junior Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * source/rtl/set.c

Re: [Harbour] 2008-03-26 16:54 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-03-27 Thread Maurilio Longo
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > 2008-03-26 16:54 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) > * harbour/source/rtl/gtos2/gtos2.c > * small changes, removed some un-needed code > - by Maurilio Longo in xHarbour > ! use screen buffer in BYTEs instead of USHORTs to avoid possible

Re: [Harbour] What about the release?

2008-03-27 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Phil Barnett wrote: > Can someone work on the what's new? Just a recap of the big things would be > great. I'll try in this weekend. best regards, Przemek ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-pr

Re: [Harbour] 2008-03-26 16:54 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-03-27 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote: > Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: > > 2008-03-26 16:54 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) > > * harbour/source/rtl/gtos2/gtos2.c > > * small changes, removed some un-needed code > > - by Maurilio Longo in xHarbour > > ! use scre

[Harbour] Encrypt DBF tables

2008-03-27 Thread Carlos Viola
Hello everyone, I would be very grateful if anybody can give me some advicel me about the following: I need to encrypt DBF data. I have memo fields in dbf tables. Is there any way to do this using Harbour and CDX ? If the problem are memo fields, do you know if there is another solution like ch

Re: [Harbour] 2008-03-26 16:54 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-03-27 Thread Phil Krylov
Hi, On 27/03/2008, Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for information. There is quite big number of different PPC > processors. The ones I was working with were big endian machines but > I do not know if all. Anyhow it's good to always keep the whole code > endian clean t

Re: [Harbour] 2008-03-26 16:54 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-03-27 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Phil Krylov wrote: > PowerPCs can switch endianness programmatically so it usually depends > on OS; e.g. Mac OS Classic / Mac OS X use big-endian mode, and Windows > NT/powerpc used litlle-endian. Also I know that Microsoft Virtual PC > used to run a little-endian virtual machi

Re: [Harbour] Encrypt DBF tables

2008-03-27 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Carlos Viola wrote: > Hello everyone, > I would be very grateful if anybody can give me some advicel me about > the following: > I need to encrypt DBF data. I have memo fields in dbf tables. Is there > any way to do this using Harbour and CDX ? Now not. The DBF encryption with

[Harbour] Fwd: Encrypt DBF tables

2008-03-27 Thread Carlos Viola
Przemek, Thank you very much for your fast and clear answer. I understand harbour is in release freeze state at this moment. I do not need to encrypt memo fields. Encrypting only the table would be enough. Thank you again for your fantastic work! Carlos. On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Carlos Viola wr