Hi Przemek,
Viktor, I know that it was not intentional and I only express
my bad feeling. Sorry if you take this part personally.
There will be some personally taken parts in this mail
too, sorry in advance. Overall I'd suggest to move forward,
do the release, and so on. See my suggestion fo
Przemek:
>2008-02-07 20:17 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
> * harbour/config/lib.cf
>* moved some definitions for easier detecting library build mode
> * harbour/config/os2/dir.cf
> * harbour/config/os2/global.cf
>* some modifications which should help for old GNU
Saulius Zrelskis wrote:
> /*
> TODO: BCC compiler error???!!!
> I had a situation when without this donothing() call the whole loop
is not
> executed?! Really, strange! Do we have BCC error here? I hadn't
time to do
> CPU level debugging, but an extra function call influences
gene
2008-02-08 15:58 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/include/hbcomp.h
* harbour/include/hbmacro.h
* harbour/include/hbexprb.c
* harbour/source/vm/macro.c
* harbour/source/compiler/hbmain.c
! fixed name conflict in privates/publics declaration.
Harbour
Hi, "make_gnu clean" not work fine.
I am use WinXP SP2+MinGW
D:\harbour>make_gnu clean
"'" no se reconoce como un comando interno o externo,
programa o archivo por lotes ejecutable.
make: *** [clean] Error 1
D:\harbour>
Best Regards
GVS
___
Harbour mai
It seems not the right moment to take decisions about 1.0 RC1.
I suggest to reopen the tree for development, wait and see...
best regards,
Lorenzo
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/har
I subscribe any word of Pritpal Bedi
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Pritpal Bedi
Inviato: venerdì 8 febbraio 2008 15.49
A: harbour@harbour-project.org
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] 2008-02-04 09:31 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw
Czerpak(druzus/at/priv.on
On Friday, February 08, 2008, 5:12 Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
PC> Brian, can you ask extended system if we can have ace.h in
PC> our SVN/CVS repositories?
I had requested for such permission in December, 1999. And I got an
answer from them, which I immedeately posted to thi
2008-02-08 19:41 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/rddads/make_gcc.sh
* contrib/hbfimage/make_gcc.sh
! Two minor corrections to *_INC path setting examples for Windows.
--
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@h
Hello Viktor
Hello Przemek
Here is a humble request on both of you, please continue with Harbour as you
ever did.
Nobody did wrong to anybody, it just went accidentally.
You must know that a huge Harbour community is desperately dependant on your
contributions. And I hope you will not disappoin
Pritpal, Viktor, Przemek, all,
I'm not a Harbour developper but I absolutely agree and I want to
participate in this request ...
I respect them but I'm very sad after hearing the Przemek's decision.
Best regards
Juan
- Original Message -
From: "Pritpal Bedi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Hi all,
Not to minimize the contributions of the other developers, but I
think we would all agree that Harbour would not be the success it is
today without Przemek's contributions and, losing him (especially
being so close to Release 1), will no doubt have a serious negative
impact on the pr
2008-02-08 16:51 UTC+0100 Marek Paliwoda (mpaliwoda at interia pl)
+ harbour/contrib/gtwvg/make_gcc.sh
+ harbour/contrib/hbapollo/make_gcc.sh
+ harbour/contrib/hbclipsm/make_gcc.sh
+ harbour/contrib/hbct/make_gcc.sh
+ harbour/contrib/hbfbird/make_gcc.sh
+ harbour/contrib/hbfimage/make_
Hello
This sample:
procedure main
use D:\harbour\tests\test.dbf
? first
quit
In Clipper:
E:\SyS_GVS\CuC>test1
Homer
E:\SyS_GVS\CuC>
In Harbour:
E:\SyS_GVS\CuC>testhb
Error BASE/1003 Variable does not exist: FIRST
Called from MAIN(3)
E:\SyS_GVS\CuC>
TEST.DBF in folder \harbour\tests
Best Rega
On Friday 08 February 2008 10:48:58 am Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
> It seems not the right moment to take decisions about 1.0 RC1.
>
> I suggest to reopen the tree for development, wait and see...
No, we need to release a build. If we don't this thing will never get done.
Why should we not finish Har
On Feb 9, 2008 5:33 AM, Phil Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why should we not finish Harbour at this time?
Because the two main developers don't agree about latest changes.
Because both have announced they'll leave the project.
So since it's unlike we'll have a 1.1 I think we should at le
On Saturday 09 February 2008 12:08:39 am Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
> So since it's unlike we'll have a 1.1 I think we should at least leave
> the lib names as they have been in the last 8 years and do a favor to
> poor users.
Is the repository in an unusable state?
--
"Sometimes I wonder whether t
Lorenzo,
Why should we not finish Harbour at this time?
Because the two main developers don't agree about latest changes.
It happens not the first time, and I hope not the last time ;-).
Many times the difference in opinions is a stimulating process.
Of course, sometimes it's a "destructive"
18 matches
Mail list logo
