On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
> what are situations and rules to use hb_itemLockReadCPtr()? Pointer to C
> string could be obtained not only by using hb_itemGetCPtr(). There is a
> number of other methods, hb_parc() is an example.
>
> HB_FUNC( MYFUNC2 )
> {
>char* szPa
2008-01-12 13:12 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/source/vm/itemapi.c
! fixed hb_itemLockReadCPtr() used for static strings
best regards
Przemek
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour
2008-01-12 13:19 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/ChangeLog
* harbour/include/hbapiitm.h
* harbour/source/vm/itemapi.c
- removed hb_itemLockReadCPtr()/hb_itemLockWriteCPtr()/hb_itemUnLockCPtr()
Whole modification which will address all different aspects
Hello Friends,
I have a database that has 3 numeric fields likes:
N1N 160
N2N 160
N3N 160
and I need to make a lot of indexes like
INDEX ON Str(n1)+Str(n2)+Str(n3) TAG "n1n2n3" TO myindex
INDEX ON Str(n2)+Str(n1)+Str(n3) TAG "n2n1n3" TO myindex ADDITIVE
I
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote:
> Hello Friends,
> I have a database that has 3 numeric fields likes:
> N1N 160
> N2N 160
> N3N 160
> and I need to make a lot of indexes like
> INDEX ON Str(n1)+Str(n2)+Str(n3) TAG "n1n2n3" TO myindex
> IN
Hi Viktor,
Below test code when run between Harbour and xHarbour demonstrates one
difference specifically on the TBrowse column alignment. I was able to
compile in Harbour my whole console application successfully but this
difference, personally, is a show stopper. If it's not too much to as
I report just for information what Selinux alerts under Fc8/i386 if I
run an Harbour app that use libharbour-1.1.1.so:
The x application attempted to load /usr/lib/libharbour-1.1.1.so
which requires text relocation. This is a potential security problem.
Most libraries do not need this permissi
Hi Przemek,
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] How reduce concatenation size of numeric fields
inindex ?
[snip]
CDX will compress such index
Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>
> ..
>> I feel my letter is more like brainstorming before a sleep than a letter
>> of the ideas I really want to see implemented. Usage of
>> hb_stackReturnItem() is more fast than making a copy of item. In many
>> cases hb_stackReturnItem() is OK. Maybe we can
