Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
>
> ..
>> I feel my letter is more like brainstorming before a sleep than a letter
>> of the ideas I really want to see implemented. Usage of
>> hb_stackReturnItem() is more fast than making a copy of item. In many
>> cases hb_stackReturnItem() is OK. Maybe we can use hb_stackReturnItem()
>> for internal code and hb_itemNew( hb_stackReturnItem() ) for public API.
>
> pItem = hb_itemReturnCopy( pItem /* or NULL */ ) ?
>
> ..
>
Przemyslaw,
hb_itemReturnCopy is typo ( I mean hb_itemReturn )?
Or it is a part new API?
Regards,
Petr
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/2008-01-11-18%3A01-UTC%2B0100-Przemyslaw-Czerpak-%28druzus-at-priv.onet.pl%29-tp14761094p14783034.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
