Found it, don't bother.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Thanks for the corrections.
>
> Yes, obviously we don't want to focus on supporting older versions due the
> licensing. (well, technically we could, but
> it isn't worth the effort as I doubt users would use this l
Thanks for the corrections.
Yes, obviously we don't want to focus on supporting older versions due the
licensing. (well, technically we could, but
it isn't worth the effort as I doubt users would use this lib for open
source development, nor do I think many would
like to buy a license).
I guess i
