Re: [Harbour] TIMESTAMP/DATETIME conversions

2009-03-18 Thread Viktor Szakáts
> > The 'f' comes from 'f'ractional part but for me any proposition > which will not confuse user is good. IF PHP uses 'u' then we can > also use it. We should simply chose the most commonly used signature > which is different then: 'h', 'm' and 's'. PHP uses u for *microsecond* (hence the "u"),

Re: [Harbour] TIMESTAMP/DATETIME conversions

2009-03-18 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi, > > Now I would like to ask your proposition for letter used to mark > > milliseconds in _SET_TIME format. xHarbour use 'c', f.e.: > > hh:mm:ss.ccc > > I used 'f': > > hh:mm:ss.fff > I trust you that .fff is the better choice, 'c' seems to be use

Re: [Harbour] TIMESTAMP/DATETIME conversions

2009-03-18 Thread Viktor Szakáts
Hi Przemek, > Now I would like to ask your proposition for letter used to mark > milliseconds in _SET_TIME format. xHarbour use 'c', f.e.: > hh:mm:ss.ccc > I used 'f': > hh:mm:ss.fff I trust you that .fff is the better choice, 'c' seems to be used for other purposes in other languages, 'f'

Re: [Harbour] TIMESTAMP/DATETIME conversions

2009-03-18 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Edmer wrote: Hi, > Has this been finalized already ? Yes I implemented it. But before I'll commit it I would like to cleanup function names and create some small set of functions to operate on timestamp values. I check in the internet functions used by ADS and VFP to operat

Re: [Harbour] TIMESTAMP/DATETIME conversions

2009-03-18 Thread Edmer
Hi Przemek, Has this been finalized already ? Thanks, Ed Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote: > > Hi All, > > I would like to ask VFP users to give me an information about some > timestamp/datetime transformations in this language. > I'm interesting in existing functions transform pictures, etc. > I