BTW,
IMHO for average Harbour users more official releases would be important.
For sure most users here build Harbour from SVN but the majority
non-hardcore users wait to official releases. In defense of these users I
would suggest release an official package at least two times by year to
facilita
>>> Before exploring this possibility, a little doubt,
>>> is Qt runtime enough for materializing an .exe to be
>>> build with hbIDE ?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>
> If this is the case then we do not need complete run-time
> of Qt. Only 4 dll's matching the version we compiled
> hbQT* is enough. Can we em
> Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>>
>> Isn't there a runtime only download package somewhere
>> on Nokia's QT website?
>>
>
> Before exploring this possibility, a little doubt,
> is Qt runtime enough for materializing an .exe to be
> build with hbIDE ?
Yes.
We made the decision at the beginning that
>> Proper solution would be to detach HBQT/HBXBP/HBIDE
>> release schedule from core and make them available as
>> a normal extra component which plugs into Harbour core
>> distribution. (which should be created separately)
>>
>
> Ok.
> So how can one obtain the latest binaries including
> hb
Yes Viktor
I think that Harbour official distro is usable out-of-the-box .
I agree that having a separate download for harbour qt& Xbase
Extension is rational way but having hbide.exe ready to run in harbour
after setup is very exciting idea
2010/5/31 Viktor Szakáts
>
> > Massimo Belgrano wrote
> Massimo Belgrano wrote:
>>
>> or possible 2.1 beta?
>>
>
> This has what relation to my query ?
I guess it's in relation to avoid a non-official distro
for the sake of HBQT.
Proper solution would be to detach HBQT/HBXBP/HBIDE
release schedule from core and make them available as
a normal
