Pritpal Bedi escreveu:
> Marcos
>
> Marcos Gambeta-2 wrote:
>> http://labs.trolltech.com/forums/topic/516
>>
>
> It seems it is too much work.
> So what is the simple solution to just disable it
> in Harbour builds from outside of the the QT.
>
> One solution is just not include QAx* classes at al
Marcos
Marcos Gambeta-2 wrote:
>
> http://labs.trolltech.com/forums/topic/516
>
It seems it is too much work.
So what is the simple solution to just disable it
in Harbour builds from outside of the the QT.
One solution is just not include QAx* classes at all.
But I am looking for some #defi
Pritpal Bedi escreveu:
>
> Can you locate what changes we need to achieve so?
>
Changes are here:
http://labs.trolltech.com/forums/topic/516
Regards,
Marcos Gambeta
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.or
Pritpal Bedi escreveu:
>
> I am trying to compile QAxBase class and recieve this error
>
More from ActiveQt:
http://labs.qtsoftware.com/blogs/2009/03/03/qt-45-hits-the-virtual-shelves/
==
Posted by A.Konrad
on Tuesday, March 03, 2009 @ 20:00
Congratulations! Can’t wait to try the new S
Marcos
Marcos Gambeta-2 wrote:
>
> However, we have not yet modified the buildsystem to support that. So,
> you'll have to make those modifications yourself for the time being.
>
Can you locate what changes we need to achieve so?
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
PS: Just because till I am done with bas
Great News!
2009/4/1 Marcos Gambeta
> ActiveQt is BSD licensed, that's correct. So you're allowed to use it in
> an open source or closed source application.
>
> However, we have not yet modified the buildsystem to support that. So,
> you'll have to make those modifications yourself for the time
Viktor Szakáts escreveu:
> I think the OpenSource edition of QT doesn't support ActiveQT.
>
This discussion is from Qt newsgroups:
From: "Benjamin Parzella"
Newsgroups: trolltech.qt-interest
Subject: [Qt-interest] License ActiveQt Open Source 4.5
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:16:10 +0100
H
Seem that ActiveQt is only for windows and only for commercial license.
Is the only qt part in this situation?
2009/4/1 Marcos Gambeta
> Viktor Szakáts escreveu:
> > I think the OpenSource edition of QT doesn't support ActiveQT.
> >
>
> When i try to compile ActiveQt, i get:
>
> C:\Qt\2009.01\qt
Viktor Szakáts escreveu:
> I think the OpenSource edition of QT doesn't support ActiveQT.
>
When i try to compile ActiveQt, i get:
C:\Qt\2009.01\qt\src\activeqt\container>qmake container.pro
Project MESSAGE: You are not licensed to use ActiveQt.
Project MESSAGE: You are not licensed to use Activ
Hi Pritpal,
look at:
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/activeqt.html#activeqt
"The ActiveQt modules are part of the Qt Full Framework Edition. They
are not part of the Open Source Versions of Qt."
:-(
Best regards,
Francesco
Il 01/04/2009 18.01, Pritpal Bedi ha scritto:
Hello Everybody
Can som
I think the OpenSource edition of QT doesn't support ActiveQT.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
>
> Sorry, forget to mention how you can reproduce it:
>
> - Stay in harbour/contrib/hbqt/generator
> - Issue : hbqtgen -I..\qth QAxBase.qth
>
> Regards
> Pritpal Bedi
Sorry, forget to mention how you can reproduce it:
- Stay in harbour/contrib/hbqt/generator
- Issue : hbqtgen -I..\qth QAxBase.qth
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/QT---An-Issue-to-Resolve-tp22829528p22829530.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing
12 matches
Mail list logo