You are right
also if last Offer of fivetech is started from Aug 20, 2009 and
reading post i think that about 20 user have completed works/request
copies
Fivewin for [x]Harbour have 69000 messages (90.00 total) so is a big
comunity 1500 user
This comunity know and use Harbour so i think a way of co
I noticed that Antonio Linares have a right idea
request contribute in the wiki for fivetech product and pay with
fivetech product
and seem also having a good response
Compliment!
What can we do something of similar?
Can we search any kind of collaboration with Fivetech?
FiveTech wants to outsou
I noticed that Antonio Linares have a right idea
request contribute in the wiki for fivetech product and pay with
fivetech product
and seem also having a good response
Compliment!
What can we do something of similar?
Can we search any kind of collaboration with Fivetech?
>Help to complete the wik
Very Good
Thanks!
2009/10/13 Przemyslaw Czerpak :
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
>
> in summary it means that the only one method to generate correct
> dependencies list which will always work is compiler (or code
> which fully replicates compiler and PP behavior).
> I'll add to comp
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
in summary it means that the only one method to generate correct
dependencies list which will always work is compiler (or code
which fully replicates compiler and PP behavior).
I'll add to compiler support for such functionality.
It will work like -M in GCC.
For hbmk2 w
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> I'll add to compiler support for such functionality.
> It will work like -M in GCC.
> For hbmk2 which uses embedded Harbour compiler I also add support
> for function which will return list of dependencies instead of
> sending them to
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
>> Please also remember that Harbour supports also #pragma __[c]streaminclude
>> which should also be detected and in the future may support some other
>> extensions like using compiler switches in #if expressions, i.e.:
>> #if enabled( -kh )
>> #in
It has to be fully integrated with compiler because included files
may depend on conditional compilation so you have to activate compiler
with all compiler switches which are used for normal compilation (plus
switch(es) which enable autodependent checking) to preproces .prg
files
otherwise it w
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
> I can't solve the PP parser part, but if such
> function gets added to core, I'm ready to add support
> for it in hbmk2.
> Przemek, do you think that such function would be possible
> to implement?
> __PP_INCLUDELIST( , ) ->
> (or something with
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
The text is clear for me but it's not clear for me what you used
so far...
Windows definitions can be (optionally) stored in external text files
with '.fmg' extension.
This is very useful, ie, to editing purposes (I've created a visual
editor to do that).
This
Hi Przemek,
The text is clear for me but it's not clear for me what you used
so far. In my opinion such functionality can be implemented only
inside PP and all tools which tries to make it without replicating
whole PP logic with all compiler predefined settings and macros are
buggy by definition
Massimo Belgrano wrote:
about hbmk2 can you post a little sample (also with minigui) so i
will try
Facts are that Viktor have modified each error post here regarding
hbmk2
I've explained in a post on Sunday:
http://www.hmgforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=5494#p5494
Thank you. [ Sorry, but I'm n
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Roberto Lopez wrote:
Hi,
>> about hbmk2 can you post a little sample (also with minigui) so i will try
>> Facts are that Viktor have modified each error post here regarding hbmk2
> I've explained in a post on Sunday:
> http://www.hmgforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=5494#p5494
The t
Massimo Belgrano wrote:
about hbmk2 can you post a little sample (also with minigui) so i will try
Facts are that Viktor have modified each error post here regarding hbmk2
I've explained in a post on Sunday:
http://www.hmgforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=5494#p5494
Regards,
Roberto.
__
more important see facts that interpreter post
Facts are an active community that want share his experiences for
having a better product
Your Point of View is important because is similar to a lot of user
Same decision (no light version) is result of various steep
I suggest Viktor trasform prev po
On 2009 Oct 12, at 23:13, Roberto Lopez wrote:
Viktor:
I'm very sad because your interpretation of the facts.
Maybe, as Angel said, it could be because idiomatic barriers
(English is not my native tongue).
Anyway, the facts, are that I've been working during all the weekend
to make hbmk
I agree with Angel about idiomatic barriers (English is not my
native language).
more important see facts that interpreter post
Facts are an active community that want share his experiences for
having a better product
Your Point of View is important because is similar to a lot of user
Same decisi
Viktor:
I'm very sad because your interpretation of the facts.
Maybe, as Angel said, it could be because idiomatic barriers (English is
not my native tongue).
Anyway, the facts, are that I've been working during all the weekend to
make hbmk2 to work with HMG and published a build containing
I understand your POV, but simply I think differently.
The last thing that I want to say todoay about that, is that we
could think Harbour future as Linux one.
There is dozens (hundreds?) of distros.
As you know, each distro has his own group of developers that
creates an 'special' one, su
Viktor,
I want to put a final point to this discussion (at least, by now).
I understand your POV, but simply I think differently.
The last thing that I want to say todoay about that, is that we could
think Harbour future as Linux one.
There is dozens (hundreds?) of distros.
As you know, eac
For reference, here is my posted solution which "plugs into"
current HMG distro:
[ NOTE: the batch file is only needed to keep current "feel"
of the distro, the .hbc could be places in any standard place
instead and let it be automatically or manually picked. ]
--- BATCH\hbmk2.bat
@set PATH=%~dp
Hi Roberto,
If your goal is to supply a compact package for users,
IMO you should simply just not include Harbour itself
and mingw, but rather simply install into existing Harbour
install and provide links to Harbour installer to users.
Because Harbour distribution is not compact :)
Well, it
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> My personal experience is that the most often the sources of user
problems
are wrongly synced with Harbour core code build scripts in different add
on libraries.
<...>
I respect you and your work a lot (the same as Viktor).
Is not my intention to disturb you and
Viktor:
Prior to continue, I must point that this is a 'friendly' message.
I respect you and your work. You (among others) made possible Harbour
resurrection possible, when the project was almost 'dead'.
I don't agree with your
approach to distribute crippled Harbour.
Maybe we should have ou
Great!
Good that will export entire site from wiki to a PDF
Now i suggest a little Diffferent structure
>From actual
#Homepage,Hmg, # Compiler Options,# ADSClearAOF(),# The idle states,#
The Garbage Collector
# Harbour Extensions,# License,# ADSCustomizeAOF()
How use ?
Quick Start
# Compiler
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Roberto Lopez wrote:
Hi,
> All Harbour and contrib libraries are 'intact' (exactly as are
> distributed). The same applies for 'harbour.exe' and basic docs. So, bugs
> in Harbour compiler found by HMG users should be not a problem for Harbour
> developers.
My personal exp
Thanks Roberto. I think though, that this still isn't a
complete Harbour distro, as its missing crucial parts as
hbmk2, hbrun, hbi18n, .dlls and INSTALL doc. Which means
the even the most important pointers and tools are missing
which are used as a starting point in normal Harbour usage
and suppor
Viktor:
Thanks Roberto. I think though, that this still isn't a
complete Harbour distro, as its missing crucial parts as
hbmk2, hbrun, hbi18n, .dlls and INSTALL doc. Which means
the even the most important pointers and tools are missing
which are used as a starting point in normal Harbour usage
Massimo Belgrano wrote:
Very Good news
I am sure that hmg user base will help in having more realibility
Please include hbmk2 in harbour distribution
About DOC you must kwnow:
Doc on Harbour site is a way
hbdoc2 is another way not jet ready
a hpl documentation came from HMG extended
Harbour Onl
Very Good news
I am sure that hmg user base will help in having more realibility
Please include hbmk2 in harbour distribution
About DOC you must kwnow:
Doc on Harbour site is a way
hbdoc2 is another way not jet ready
a hpl documentation came from HMG extended
Harbour Online Help Manual at http://
Hi Roberto,
We published an experimental HMG release based on
100% 'pure' Harbour 2.0 build subset. So, supporting
Harbour compiler bundled in HMG, shouldn't be
a problem to Harbour developers (http://www.hmgforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=879
).
Another interesting Massimo idea is to have a Wi
31 matches
Mail list logo
