Yes, yes, hb_isphantom() or hb_phantom() would be better,
or else :)
Brgds.
Viktor
On 2008.02.12., at 16:04, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Hi all,
Strict compatibiliy. If we need an enhanced
Eof() function (or one that behaves differently), we
should int
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> Hi all,
> Strict compatibiliy. If we need an enhanced
> Eof() function (or one that behaves differently), we
> should introduce a separate function for it (hb_eof() f.e.).
It should not have EOF in the name. As I said some future RDDs
may support two (b
ECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Mast
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:17 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Eof == .T. on Phantom record
Przemek,
Thank you very much for your reply.
What is the others developer's idea on this?
Keep it strict Clipper compatible
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Mike Evans (Gmail) wrote:
> Of course you are right with this example but try to add a DBsetfilter( NIL,
> ".T." ) before dbskip(-1) (or any filter that produce a file without any
> visible records and under (x)Harbour you get .T. .F. 0 1 and under clipper
> 5.3 you get .T. .T
Hi all,
Strict compatibiliy. If we need an enhanced
Eof() function (or one that behaves differently), we
should introduce a separate function for it (hb_eof() f.e.).
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.02.12., at 13:16, Patrick Mast wrote:
Przemek,
Thank you very much for your reply.
What is the others d
Przemek,
Thank you very much for your reply.
What is the others developer's idea on this?
Keep it strict Clipper compatible or change current EOF behaviour?
Patrick
On Feb 12, 2008 12:10 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Patrick Mast wrote:
> > Hello Prz
Mike Evans
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Przemyslaw Czerpak
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:10 PM
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Eof == .T. on Phantom record
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Patrick Mast wrote:
> Hello P
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Patrick Mast wrote:
> Hello Przemek,
> Did you receive my private mail regarding "Eof == .T. on Phantom record"?
> Thanks!
It's normal Clipper behavior replicated in [x]Harbour:
proc main(rdd)
rddSetDefault(iif(empty(rdd),"DBFCDX",rdd))
? rddSetDefault()
d
