Yes, yes, hb_isphantom() or hb_phantom() would be better,
or else :)
Brgds.
Viktor
On 2008.02.12., at 16:04, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Hi all,
Strict compatibiliy. If we need an enhanced
Eof() function (or one that behaves differently), we
should introduce a separate function for it (hb_eof() f.e.).
It should not have EOF in the name. As I said some future RDDs
may support two (both and bottom) phantom records and such function
name will confuse users.
best regards,
Przemek
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
