RE: [Harbour] Foreign libs

2008-05-21 Thread Massimo Belgrano
Wich kind of makefile is in Utils\hbdoc\makefile? Will this structure be used as make_file instead old hbmake? # # $Id: Makefile 8377 2008-04-24 19:26:54Z vszakats $ # ifeq ($(HB_MAIN),) HB_MAIN = std endif ROOT = ../../ PRG_SOURCES=\ hbdoc.prg \ genos2.prg \ gentrf.

RE: [Harbour] Foreign libs

2008-05-20 Thread Massimo Belgrano
ssage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Massimo Belgrano Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 7:39 PM To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject: RE: [Harbour] Foreign libs >> Then I try add this three lib but from hbmake I receive error C: >> \HARBOUR\BI

RE: [Harbour] Foreign libs

2008-05-19 Thread Massimo Belgrano
: [Harbour] Foreign libs > IMO a make system is important > My suggestion is made something siple as sostititive for hbmake so > > / PDH Project Definition Harbour - File created by hbmake Version 2.0 > Date: 21.10.08 Time: 15:32:27 > WARNINGLEVEL = 0 > COMPILE_FLAG = -DE

Re: [Harbour] Foreign libs

2008-05-19 Thread Szakáts Viktor
IMO a make system is important My suggestion is made something siple as sostititive for hbmake so / PDH Project Definition Harbour - File created by hbmake Version 2.0 Date: 21.10.08 Time: 15:32:27 WARNINGLEVEL = 0 COMPILE_FLAG = -DEURO GUI = YES OBJ = objpath [myproject.exe] = myprg1.prg ,mypr

RE: [Harbour] Foreign libs

2008-05-19 Thread Massimo Belgrano
>> Then I try add this three lib but from hbmake I receive error C: >> \HARBOUR\BIN\bin\harbour.cfg cannot be created. FERROR >I didn't want to raise this, but, is there any objection >to actually _remove_ hbmake altogether? Seems like it >raises more questions than does good, and I cannot see >

Re: [Harbour] Foreign libs

2008-05-19 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't want to raise this, but, is there any objection > to actually _remove_ hbmake altogether? Seems like it > ... > Any opinions? IMHO a tool like that will never be useful: too heavy for easy tasks, too light for c

Re: [Harbour] Foreign libs

2008-05-19 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Then I try add this three lib but from hbmake I receive error C: \HARBOUR\BIN\bin\harbour.cfg cannot be created. FERROR I didn't want to raise this, but, is there any objection to actually _remove_ hbmake altogether? Seems like it raises more questions than does good, and I cannot see many peopl

RE: [Harbour] Foreign libs

2008-05-19 Thread Massimo Belgrano
plications? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Szakáts Viktor Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 5:28 PM To: Harbour Project Main Developer List. Subject: Re: [Harbour] Foreign libs Could you test it with ace32.dll? Would be great if your could post s

Re: [Harbour] Foreign libs

2008-05-19 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Could you test it with ace32.dll? Would be great if your could post some result .lib(s) somewhere. Brgds, Viktor On 2008.05.19., at 17:00, Massimo Belgrano wrote: Convert DLL file into its equivalent static library by binarysoft http://www.binary-soft.com/dll2lib/dll2lib.htm How to create .lib

RE: [Harbour] Foreign libs

2008-05-19 Thread Massimo Belgrano
Convert DLL file into its equivalent static library by binarysoft http://www.binary-soft.com/dll2lib/dll2lib.htm How to create .lib file when you only have .dll and .h files http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/libfromdll.aspx Will be used also for rddads, harupdf? Without include his source in harbo