Re: [Harbour] v1.0.2

2008-10-05 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Randy, 1.0.1 is _very stable_. From the 4 fixes marked for merge from 1.1 to 1.0.2, only one is critical, and only if -gc3 is used with certain code. [this is also very easy to retrofit into 1.0.1 source.] This one alone doesn't justify a few days/weeks worth of heavy release work. For me at

Re: [Harbour] v1.0.2

2008-10-05 Thread Randy Portnoff
Hi Viktor, IMO, we need a stable Harbour version ASAP - Therefore, bug fixes only. Regards, Randy. At 03:57 PM 10/3/2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Randy, There may be one. So far only just a few (exactly 4) fixes were marked to be merged there, so I think we should wait until some more comes,

Re: [Harbour] v1.0.2

2008-10-03 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Randy, There may be one. So far only just a few (exactly 4) fixes were marked to be merged there, so I think we should wait until some more comes, and/or we should decide which selected trunk _features_ we may want to merge there (like dlmalloc.c), and whether these are safe enough. Also, we

[Harbour] v1.0.2

2008-10-03 Thread Randy Portnoff
Hi all, Is there going to be a v1.0.2 for the stable build? Regards, Randy. ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour