Hi Randy,
1.0.1 is _very stable_. From the 4 fixes marked
for merge from 1.1 to 1.0.2, only one is critical,
and only if -gc3 is used with certain code.
[this is also very easy to retrofit into 1.0.1 source.]
This one alone doesn't justify a few days/weeks worth
of heavy release work. For me at least. If there is
someone to volunteer to create the release, it's of
course no problem for me.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.10.04., at 1:37, Randy Portnoff wrote:
Hi Viktor,
IMO, we need a stable Harbour version ASAP - Therefore, bug fixes
only.
Regards,
Randy.
At 03:57 PM 10/3/2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Hi Randy,
There may be one. So far only just a few (exactly 4) fixes
were marked to be merged there, so I think we should
wait until some more comes, and/or we should decide which
selected trunk _features_ we may want to merge there
(like dlmalloc.c), and whether these are safe enough.
Also, we should take a close eye on 1.1, since maybe
it'd be better to invest efforts to do a stable 1.1 release
as early as possible.
Input and opinions are welcome from everyone.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.10.03., at 15:58, Randy Portnoff wrote:
Hi all,
Is there going to be a v1.0.2 for the stable build?
Regards,
Randy.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
