Hi Przemek,
It's too much now. I neglected everything else for
Harbour, now it's time to do other things. I simply
can't dedicate a few hours for such modifications
now and believe me it would be even more than that,
since if I don't concentrate I break other things,
feedback is coming back again
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
> If this is the only reason you use it, just rename
> all those .clp files to .hbm and problems will go away.
> Again, I'm no .clp user, but the point of .clp seems
> to be that listed .prgs will be compiled into one
> object, which may be important
Hi sali,
Difficult to tell what it'd take to add support,
can't even tell if it's trivial or not. I hope .clp
just to say, we use .clp files as simple file-list colection, list
of .prgs to be compiled into single .obj
never heard that .clp could be anything more than that
[later, that .objs
- Original Message -
From: "Viktor Szakáts"
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Harbour] hbmk2, -inc and .clp files
Difficult to tell what it'd take to add support,
can't even tell if it
+1
2009/11/4 Viktor Szakáts :
> Well, on that bombshell, we could add a contrib
> which give some level of support for Blinker functions,
> I'd assume they are used in many Clipper apps.
> Most of them can be converted to simple dummy
> calls, some of them to Harbour function wrappers.
>
> Just an
Hi Alex,
On 2009 Nov 4, at 14:05, Alex Strickland wrote:
Hi Viktor
I thought I would compile an old clipper app to see how it would go
with gtwvt.
Firstly, it is truly amazing to see literally 100's of 1000's of
lines compile in a flash. At the end of the whole affair, I get only
27 li
Hi Viktor
I thought I would compile an old clipper app to see how it would go with gtwvt.
Firstly, it is truly amazing to see literally 100's of 1000's of lines compile
in a flash. At the end of the whole affair, I get only 27 linker errors, the
majority of which are blinker calls - really, am
