These particular jobs however aren't, yet you didn't mention original author
and/or source:
2009-04-23 16:25 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet
2009-03-02 10:24 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet
2009-02-24 13:40 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet
2009-02-20 13:50 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet
2009-01-16
Ranier Vilela escribió:
I´m a wrong or Miguel (xharbour) continue with politic "not to the
credit of author"?
2009-04-24 17:49 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet
mailto:miguelan...@marchuet.net>>
* include\hbapi.h
* source\rtl\dateshb.c
* source\rtl\set.c
+ Added setget function for TIMEFO
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Hi Phil,
You write about code, while my intent isn't to change any code
license at all. My intent is to *add* license for non-code, particularly
my non-code parts and future additions, these parts didn't have any
license so far. Having two licenses is no problem at all,
Hi Phil,
You write about code, while my intent isn't to change any code
license at all. My intent is to *add* license for non-code, particularly
my non-code parts and future additions, these parts didn't have any
license so far. Having two licenses is no problem at all, since code
and non-code (do
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Two better links:
CC-by-sa:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
GFDL:
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2009.04.28., at 10:13, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
I did some research and considering that ChangeLog counts as
documentation (not code), I'
Two better links:
CC-by-sa:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
GFDL:
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2009.04.28., at 10:13, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
I did some research and considering that ChangeLog counts as
documentation (not code), I've found the following
I did some research and considering that ChangeLog counts as
documentation (not code), I've found the following option for
proper copyright protection for these elements of Harbour:
- Creative Commons: cc-by-sa
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses
- FSF GFDL
http://en.wikipedia.
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Hi Phil,
/* Copyright notice:
All text in this file holds the copyright of respective authors
seen in
the entry headers if not indicated otherwise. Copying or other
forms of
usage is only permitted while giving credit to author including
his/her
full name, plus
Hi Phil,
/* Copyright notice:
All text in this file holds the copyright of respective authors
seen in
the entry headers if not indicated otherwise. Copying or other
forms of
usage is only permitted while giving credit to author including
his/her
full name, plus the text "Harbour Pr
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Hi Phil and All,
I'm planning to add this (or similar) text to the top of our ChangeLog
file:
---
/* Copyright notice:
All text in this file holds the copyright of respective authors seen in
the entry headers if not indicated otherwise. Copying or other forms of
Hi Phil and All,
I'm planning to add this (or similar) text to the top of our ChangeLog file:
---
/* Copyright notice:
All text in this file holds the copyright of respective authors seen in
the entry headers if not indicated otherwise. Copying or other forms of
usage is only permitted wh
20:59, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote:
-Messaggio Originale- Da: "Viktor Szakáts" >
A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List." project.org>
Data invio: venerdì 24 aprile 2009 18.46
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] Some xhb developers giving no credit when
copying work from Harbour
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Viktor Szakáts"
A: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Data invio: venerdì 24 aprile 2009 18.46
Oggetto: Re: [Harbour] Some xhb developers giving no credit when copying
work from Harbour
I see EMG already corrected it, which I
Hi
Angel Pais wrote:
>
> I hope you are refering to Miguel Angel ...
>
>
> Pritpal Bedi escribió:
>> Andi
>>
>> BTW when I read the Changelog entry by Angel, I too felt the
>> same way as is felt by Viktor and Przemek even before these
>> messages appear. What do you think what impression w
I´m a wrong or Miguel (xharbour) continue with politic "not to the
credit of author"?
2009-04-24 17:49 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet mailto:miguelan...@marchuet.net>>
* include\hbapi.h
* source\rtl\dateshb.c
* source\rtl\set.c
+ Added setget function for TIMEFORMAT
* source\rtl\tbrowse.p
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Andi Jahja wrote:
> The following entries shows us how my idea was used in Harbour without
> giving credits because "Idea Cannot Be CopyRighted". I know for sure the
> codes are not mine but I can assure you that the "Idea" to implement it
> in xHarbour was mine. This idea was
>
> Not true. Users can READ the file and WILL SEE who's codes it is (in
> this case: Przemek). Users will not refers to ChangeLog to seek who
> wrote the codes, but to the FILEs.
Authors do, plus you never know who else does, I seek this information
a lot of times, since it can give a lot of inf
Hi Andi,
> > The only connection to Ron and xhb is that I've read the Harbour list
> > and saw the function name hb_retc[len]Adopt() in one of the messages
> > (on 2002. Jan 23) which sparked the idea of implementing these new API
> > functions in Harbour, without ever knowing more than these two
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Andi Jahja wrote:
> > You missed the point, perhaps.
> > The whole issue is not revolving the source file,
> > but the declarations in the ChangeLog which pretends
> > to the users that those changes were made by thou-self.
> Not true. Users can READ the file and WILL SEE who'
Andi Jahja wrote:
This is unfair IMO, you seem to hide under the condition "IDEA CANNOT BE
COPYRIGHTED" or are you declaring yourself a genius because you can
"implement" other's stuff into yours without taking a look and then
simply stated that it is a SIMPLE thing? :-)
I am not trying to be ru
The following entries shows us how my idea was used in Harbour without
giving credits because "Idea Cannot Be CopyRighted". I know for sure the
codes are not mine but I can assure you that the "Idea" to implement it
in xHarbour was mine. This idea was first strongly rejected by Harbour
developers,
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Pritpal Bedi wrote:
> You missed the point, perhaps.
> The whole issue is not revolving the source file,
> but the declarations in the ChangeLog which pretends
> to the users that those changes were made by thou-self.
Not true. Users can READ the file an
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:25:38 +0200
Viktor Szak�ts wrote:
> The only connection to Ron and xhb is that I've read the Harbour list
> and saw the function name hb_retc[len]Adopt() in one of the messages
> (on 2002. Jan 23) which sparked the idea of implementing these new API
> functions in Harb
Andi
Andi Jahja-2 wrote:
>
> But could you please explain why it seems so important to mention such
> credits while people know that the codes which were borrowed (example:
> RDD stuffs), by themselves already BEAR the complainer's CopyRight. I
> could immediately understand if the borrower CHA
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:41:36 -0400
Phil Barnett wrote:
> But you are correct. The gentlemanly thing to do is to give credit to
> the author in downline GPL usage.
I have a very limited knowledge about this stuff :-).
But could you please explain why it seems so important to mention such
credit
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
If the license doesn't change anything, we probably shouldn't have one at
all, so I hope we agree that it's there to use it :) no offence meant.
Brgds,
Viktor
Well, the license DOES mean something. The GPL requires that copyrights
are carried forward into the borrowed c
Reading another mail from xhb list:
> 1. From day 1, the xHarbour Developers page, included this:
--
You may review the complete list of the Harbour Developers on SourceForge at
> http://sourceforge.net/project/memberlist.php?gr
Hi Przemek,
Yes, I saw your message. I've now read a few replies.
Ron is probably referring to the hb_retc_buffer() and friends situation,
which was developed by me in my local repository without looking into
any xhb source or employing methods used there (you have to take my
word for it, or look
Hi Phil,
> I'm considering changing all my licensed files with a new item requiring
> > mention of my name when using my work, but before I do I'd like
> > to sync my views with others.
>
> IMHO this is your right to do that but see below.
>
> > [ I don't even mention that among all the Harbour de
Hi Lorenzo,
Thanks for raising this aspect.
We can say that using any of the material inside another
projects in source form will need a mention of the project's name.
This doesn't seem very restrictive for anyone who'd
like to bundle the whole project to another one (like a Linux
distro, MinGW c
Przemyslaw Czerpak escreveu:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
[...]
If you have any opinion on this, please add it here, before doing such
action it'd be also nice to hear some xhb opinions.
Below is a message I sent few hours before your one to xHarbour
developer list.
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
[...]
> If you have any opinion on this, please add it here, before doing such
> action it'd be also nice to hear some xhb opinions.
Below is a message I sent few hours before your one to xHarbour
developer list. I didn't know that you plan to write
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> If you have any opinion on this, please add it here, before doing such
> action it'd be also nice to hear some xhb opinions.
I understand your position but this can "potentially" create problems.
IANAL but distros like Debian and Fedora re
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> I wanted to raise this topic for some time, it's a quite sad one
> (especially on such a nice sunny Friday as today) so
> I was holding it off, but lately Miguel Angel Marchuet again copied
> work from Harbour without giving any credit
Hi All,
I wanted to raise this topic for some time, it's a quite sad one
(especially on such a nice sunny Friday as today) so
I was holding it off, but lately Miguel Angel Marchuet again copied
work from Harbour without giving any credit whatsoever to original
authors. Around last month I've also f
35 matches
Mail list logo
