Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11064] trunk/harbour

2009-05-18 Thread Alex Strickland
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote: The only ODBC application I've ever tried to write in my life is contrib/rddsql/sddodbc/tests/test1.prg, so, I have no idea that the answer is. I would expect to be it a little slower on client part (I mean result set manipulation). I found some quite old "resea

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11064] trunk/harbour

2009-05-18 Thread Vailton Renato
The native interface is much faster than ODBC and ADO, because they usually represent a layer on the native DLL if I remember well. So here in the company we use whenever possible direct access to the native DLL. Regards, Vailton Renato ___ Harbour maili

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11064] trunk/harbour

2009-05-18 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
Hi, Alex Strickland wrote: * harbour/contrib/rddsql/Makefile + implemented ODBC driver for RDDSQL Thank you for these major contributions. Out of interest, and in your opinion, does using ODBC instead of native libraries make a big performance difference? The only ODBC application I

Re: [Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11064] trunk/harbour

2009-05-18 Thread Alex Strickland
snaipe...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: * harbour/contrib/rddsql/Makefile + implemented ODBC driver for RDDSQL Thank you for these major contributions. Out of interest, and in your opinion, does using ODBC instead of native libraries make a big performance difference? Regards Alex ___

[Harbour] SF.net SVN: harbour-project:[11064] trunk/harbour

2009-05-16 Thread snaiperis
Revision: 11064 http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11064&view=rev Author: snaiperis Date: 2009-05-16 13:54:46 + (Sat, 16 May 2009) Log Message: --- 2009-05-16 16:55 UTC+0300 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas (dbtopas/at/dbtopas.lt) * harbour/contrib