Przemyslaw,
I agree, you're right.
Maurilio.
--
__
| | | |__| Maurilio Longo
|_|_|_|| farmaconsult s.r.l.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, David Arturo Macias Corona wrote:
Hi David and Maurilio,
> >I think yes, let's wait for David confirmation, anyway HB_OS2_TCP32 is
> >more meaningfull since it pinpoints what it is changing.
> Yes Iam agree, it look better
> Please add in gcc.cf a comment for -DTCPV40HDRS ba
Przemek, Maurilio:
>>Once again thank you very much for your help. Now MT for OS2
>>seems to be fully functional and works well. Some minor things
>>can be cleaned yet but they are not big problem.
>>Have you agreed final version for TCPV40HDRS / HB_OS2_TCP32
>I think yes, let's wait for David c
Przemyslaw,
> Have you agreed final version for TCPV40HDRS / HB_OS2_TCP32
I think yes, let's wait for David confirmation, anyway HB_OS2_TCP32 is more
meaningfull since it pinpoints what it is changing.
Thanks.
Maurilio.
--
__
| | | |__| Maurilio Longo
|_|_|_|| farmaconsult s.r.
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, David Arturo Macias Corona wrote:
Hi David,
> I made a fresh build without -DHB_FM_STATISTICS_OFF
> and Harbour build/run fine
Thank you very much for test.
> It does not raise error reported by Maurilio:
>
>>> I did the change to the makefile,
Przemek, Maurilio:
[Maurilio]
yes! with fm statistics off it works wonderfully :)
[Przemek]
Thank you for confirmation. Now it should work also with memory
statistic enabled.
When we will make some other test then I'll disable stack preloading
for this systems and C compilers when it does not
Przemek, Maurilio:
[Przemek]
I'm sorry I forgot about it and I do not remember the exact arguments
against TCPV40HDRS. I should wait with committing it.
Now IMHO you should agree it together. I'm not OS2 user and I cannot
make any decision here.
If you will need arbiter then please send a messag
