>> BTW I could see that you have also worked with Python bindings
>> with Qt. Can so enumerate the differences between Qt bindings what
>> Harbour has implemented vs Python implementation ?
At first and as a start :-
In Harbour world, we have HbQt to access Qt power
In Python world we have two
Mahmoud Fayed wrote:
>
> HbQt is a **right** junction between both, where you find what you expect
> to find with no surprise
> You get Qt power without loss + Harbour technique ready to use
>
This phrase pretty much sums up your viewpoint.
Thanks for sharing, and believe me, it will be one of
>> Group will be specifically interested how did you rate hbQT :
>> HbQt is GREAT ( Multi-platform, Simple to learn, Easy to use and VERY
>> RICH)
For someone who like Harbour and Qt too then HbQt is the right answer.
At first before using HbQt, developer need to make two choices
The first is H
>> Hi SAmir , where I can get the source of this language
Supernova License : Freeware (Up to now)
Not open source,... but I have a plane to go in this direction very soon, i
mean i have a plane to release the source code but i am not ready yet to do
this step, there are many works required to be
Hello Samir
MAHMOUD SAMIR wrote:
>
> HbQt is GREAT ( Multi-platform, Simple to learn, Easy to use and VERY
> RICH)
>
Can you share your journey through hbQT and the perspective and
support behind above statement. Harbour community will gain a lot
more confidence in using hbQT for productio
