On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> In fact the overall goal is the opposite: Allow developers
> to create addons completely independently from Harbour
> code, yet make them easily manageable and pluggable
> for users. That's what I'd like to encourage 3rd party
> developers
> Angel Pais escreveu:
>> - Invite Marcos Antonio gambeta to integrate xhgtk into harbour`s tree.
>
> I am not against this idea. But i have one question (maybe more than one):
>
> xHarbour developers have interest in the library too. If the developmente of
> the xhgtk move to /harbour/contrib,
Marcos Gambeta escreveu:
xHarbour developers have interest in the library too.
Only to clarify: i'm talking about developers that use xHarbour and not
the developers that develop the xHarbour.
--
Regards,
Marcos Antonio Gambeta
___
Harbour mailing
Angel Pais escreveu:
- Invite Marcos Antonio gambeta to integrate xhgtk into harbour`s tree.
I am not against this idea. But i have one question (maybe more than one):
xHarbour developers have interest in the library too. If the
developmente of the xhgtk move to /harbour/contrib, what will ha
Viktor Szakáts escribió:
Hi All,
In the spirit of release enthusiasm it's now also
a good time to brainstorm a little on things which
we would like to make it into next major Harbour
release.
Hi Viktor, You've opened Pandora's box here :)
My 5 minutes brainstorming list:
- A RPC protoco
