>
> But so far I haven't seen that any of Windows developers here
> tried to document dependencies created by different Windows C
> compilers. I only heard few times that binaries created by compiler
> XYZ do not work with some older version ZXY Windows version but
> without any precise information
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
Hi,
> gtxwc have one platform supported (linux)
> (so imo is related to this topics)
> If the rule for exist is related to number of platform supported
> gtwvg and gtxwc must be is same (irregolar) situation
GTXWC is supported by Linux, HPUX, SunOS, B
Gtwvg is a highly win specific lib with no counterparts on other
platforms. Your prg code will be win only. Plus it's x86 specific, was
never successfully tested on ce, x64, unicode, uses internals, non
ansi c code, breaks core and other contrib namespaces, has redundant
winapi parts, code non port
Ok, but can you explain where gtwvg not follow this route
I have read only about platform problem in precedent post
2009/3/26 Viktor Szakáts :
> Gtxwc is the pair of gtwvt. Both plat spec, both core & compatible
> with each other. I'm not "fire" at anyone in any personal sense, but a
> release is
Gtxwc is the pair of gtwvt. Both plat spec, both core & compatible
with each other. I'm not "fire" at anyone in any personal sense, but a
release is unlikely with current approach.
On 3/26/09, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> 2009/3/26 Viktor Szakáts :
>>> In my opinion gtwvt will be very useful for har
2009/3/26 Viktor Szakáts :
>> In my opinion gtwvt will be very useful for harbour user in windows 32
>
>>
>> xbase++ class & gtwvw is also a important bridge for Xbase developer
>> and xharbour+gtwvw
>> No support for ,windows ce,windows 64,linux but maybe wine ..is
>> similar situation to gtxwc,g
>
> In my opinion gtwvt will be very useful for harbour user in windows 32
> because allow a easy switch cui gui
You mean gtwvg, I guess.
> xbase++ class & gtwvw is also a important bridge for Xbase developer
> and xharbour+gtwvw
> No support for ,windows ce,windows 64,linux but maybe wine ..i
In my opinion gtwvt will be very useful for harbour user in windows 32
because allow a easy switch cui gui
xbase++ class & gtwvw is also a important bridge for Xbase developer
and xharbour+gtwvw
No support for ,windows ce,windows 64,linux but maybe wine ..is
similar situation to gtxwc,gtwvw
a docu
Thanks Angel. I agree with you.
If we indeed think this direction seriously we could make
some moves to separate portable and non-portable libs
from each other. Something should count as portable if
at least Windows (including x86, x64 and wince),
Linux and Darwin are supported. If more platforms a
I share the principle of Angel's view.
Focus is important.
Some similar kind of decisions was made by Ubuntu project when they started
their "fork" from Debian - they excluded some platforms which they considered
to be less in use.
Support of too many platform variants takes resources.
De
Hello Viktor:
Here's an outsider's point of view and vision about harbour.
This is a multiplattform compiler so in my personall point of view the
only c commpiler that should be guaranteed to work flawless is gcc/mingw.
Other compilers should be responsibility of special distros supporters.
Als
11 matches
Mail list logo
