Re: [Harbour] Re: 2008-01-30 21:30 UTC+0100 Marek Paliwoda (mpaliwoda at interia pl)

2008-01-31 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Jan 31, 2008 5:50 PM, Marek Paliwoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am curious what my changes have to do with > hb-func.sh, rpms and debs ? Could you explain > a little bit more ? Nothing against "your" changes, worried about "all" late minute changes. best regards, Lorenzo _

Re: [Harbour] Re: 2008-01-30 21:30 UTC+0100 Marek Paliwoda (mpaliwoda at interia pl)

2008-01-31 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Thanks Marek. (This correctly reads "backslash to forward slash".) Brgds, Viktor On 2008.01.31., at 18:06, Marek Paliwoda wrote: Hi Viktor, This broke the normal BCC build method because you've changed the forward slash to backslash in common.mak, and now TLIB wants to process some path name

[Harbour] Re: 2008-01-30 21:30 UTC+0100 Marek Paliwoda (mpaliwoda at interia pl)

2008-01-31 Thread Marek Paliwoda
Hi Viktor, This broke the normal BCC build method because you've changed the forward slash to backslash in common.mak, and now TLIB wants to process some path names as command line switches. Ok, I've got it. I'll revert the change imidiately. -- Marek ___

[Harbour] Re: 2008-01-30 21:30 UTC+0100 Marek Paliwoda (mpaliwoda at interia pl)

2008-01-31 Thread Marek Paliwoda
Hi Lorenzo, I'd propose to revert and discuss your change and implement it after the release. Only fixes are permitted since last week in the repository. Just my personal opinion but such deep changes to the build system right before RC1 is not a good idea. What about hb-func.sh? What about rp

[Harbour] Re: 2008-01-30 21:30 UTC+0100 Marek Paliwoda (mpaliwoda at interia pl)

2008-01-31 Thread Marek Paliwoda
Hi Viktor, This broke the normal BCC build method because you've changed the forward slash to backslash in common.mak, and now TLIB wants to process some path names as command line switches. Everything builds *without* problems here either with Bcc or Msvc. I'd suggest to check your environmen