Re: [Harbour] BCC 5.8 two remaining warnings

2008-08-04 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Mon, 04 Aug 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > >Probably yet another problem with stdint.h in BCC5.8 > >But without this compiler I can only guess what's wrong > >this time: try to add yet another hack like for INT32_MIN > >but this time for INT64_MIN: > > #undef INT64_MIN > > #define

Re: [Harbour] BCC 5.8 two remaining warnings

2008-08-04 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, Probably yet another problem with stdint.h in BCC5.8 But without this compiler I can only guess what's wrong this time: try to add yet another hack like for INT32_MIN but this time for INT64_MIN: #undef INT64_MIN #define INT64_MIN ((int64_t) (-INT64_MAX-1)) I've tried this now

Re: [Harbour] BCC 5.8 two remaining warnings

2008-08-01 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, > By cleaning the many warnings, two new ones got revealed: > Warning W8056 source\rdd\dbf1.c 2379: Integer arithmetic overflow in > function hb_dbfPutValue > Warning W8056 source\rdd\dbf1.c 2398: Integer arithmetic overflow in > function

[Harbour] BCC 5.8 two remaining warnings

2008-07-31 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, By cleaning the many warnings, two new ones got revealed: Warning W8056 source\rdd\dbf1.c 2379: Integer arithmetic overflow in function hb_dbfPutValue Warning W8056 source\rdd\dbf1.c 2398: Integer arithmetic overflow in function hb_dbfPutValue Both lines use the HB_DBL_LIM_64()