adordd not work in the new version?
Regards
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Hi Roberto,
It should. The best is if you try, and report your findings.
Ok. It appears to be working fine.
Thanks.
Regards,
Roberto.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mail
Hi Roberto,
It should. The best is if you try, and report your findings.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.06.25., at 23:50, Roberto Lopez wrote:
Hi All,
Ok. I've found 'hbw32' in contrib.
Does it provide adequate OLE support for ADORDD?
TIA.
Roberto.
___
Hi All,
Ok. I've found 'hbw32' in contrib.
Does it provide adequate OLE support for ADORDD?
TIA.
Roberto.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Hi All,
I continue testing Harbour RC1 MingW binaries published and I've found
that ADORDD samples are not working.
I've remembered that Beta 3 sources included two OLE library versions.
The 'old' harbour version and the xHarbour one. ADORDD required the new
(xHarbour) version.
Replacing t
What is the equivalent function for DbSeek() in ADORDD.
Thanks,
Ed
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-ADORDD-tp16599296p16599296.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Harbour mailing list
These changes are required in adordd.prg in order to have Found()
working after a LOCATE command:
...
#define WA_FOUND 15
#define WA_SIZE 15
...
static function ADO_LOCATE( nWA, lContinue )
local aWAData:= USRRDD_AREADATA( nWA )
local oRecordSet := aWAData[ WA_RECORDSET ]