On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> >> Then what is the point of having hbrun without dynamic
> >> libs, when hbrun is built as shared binary in certain
> >> situations, so it cannot work without Harbour dynamic
> >> lib also.
> >
> > i might be misunderstanding something, but th
Viktor Szakáts napsal(a):
Yes , but there aren't any people asking or responding in this forum/list
One more reason to redirect traffic there, otherwise
it's a catch 22, nobody goes there (even with relevant
question), because there is nobody there :)
Community experts pls jump on thi
Follow is my proposal , can english people revise?
Harbour can grow your experiences and you can grow harbour?
Harbour is a language ispired from Clipper.
Harbour is modern, fast and reliable cross-platform compiler with
MultiThread support
Harbour need to grow from people wanting to participate i
>> I don't understand that, anybody can
>> subscribe to these in any combinations.
>
>
> make it mandatory subscription to a user list to access developer list
> so we have all user that read either mailing
> but a more limited number of user that can post on developer mailing list
Okay, I get i
2010/1/3 Viktor Szakáts :
>> in my opinion is due to different need of user and developer
>> but Harbour have a user that are also developer
>> we need a unique subscription for either service
>>
>> Each user choice his kind of subscription
>>
>> kind a
>> subscribe read developer list (for
>>
[Harbour-users] is replicated only to www.mail-archive.com
2010/1/3 Viktor Szakáts :
>> I want try see harbour user (not developer as requested few day ago)
>> in google group
>> can you add harbour-project+garchive-94...@googlegroups.com to
>> harbour-users list?
>
> No. Unless I can remove the r
> in my opinion is due to different need of user and developer
> but Harbour have a user that are also developer
> we need a unique subscription for either service
>
> Each user choice his kind of subscription
>
> kind a
>subscribe read developer list (for
>read and write user list
>
> k
in my opinion is due to different need of user and developer
but Harbour have a user that are also developer
we need a unique subscription for either service
Each user choice his kind of subscription
kind a
subscribe read developer list (for
read and write user list
kind b
subscribe i
> Yes , but there aren't any people asking or responding in this forum/list
One more reason to redirect traffic there, otherwise
it's a catch 22, nobody goes there (even with relevant
question), because there is nobody there :)
Community experts pls jump on this how to resolve that.
Brgds,
Vi
here we have learn follow Przemyslaw indication
About lorenzo post i also confirm that is not offensive
I can assure that we have difficult in write and in read
so it be easy made error in writing or in reading
thanks for your efforts, harbour want it,
please continue
IMO packaging is a compl
Yes , but there aren't any people asking or responding in this forum/list
Bruno
2010/1/3 Viktor Szakáts
> > Thanks Pritpal , I know that the subject of this thread is exausted
> > but I see this problems , in the list a lot if time' s when people try
> to help
> >
> > and you know that not ex
I understand all of your words , and my intention was that others understand
the same thing
Because if this I tell to Lorenzo to take care about the words used.
It think this issue terminated.
Thanks
Bruno
2010/1/3 Viktor Szakáts
> > and you know that I can`t modify the way that the packag
> Thanks Pritpal , I know that the subject of this thread is exausted
> but I see this problems , in the list a lot if time' s when people try to
> help
>
> and you know that not exist a real list for final user's , I am a final user
> trying to help others
We have both a Harbour users' forum
> and you know that I can`t modify the way that the package was created
> I not have commit permission only read , and my comment`s are to leave
> this diference clear .
>
> Why If Harbour have a lot of REAL developers , they Release a new version
> without
> having the people designed to pre
Thanks Pritpal , I know that the subject of this thread is exausted
but I see this problems , in the list a lot if time' s when people try to
help
and you know that not exist a real list for final user's , I am a final user
trying to help others
My apologies about that
Bruno
2010/1/3 Pritpa
Hello Bruno
Bruno Luciani wrote:
>
> I think you need to take care what you write in the list
>
Sorry to jump-in.
Thank you for all your contributions.
But please look at Lorenzo's message, he is not offending
in any manner and is not a personal message at all.
He is talking on technical is
I am only a Harbour developer List Reader and a Linux User with some
experience
I use linux from 1997
and you know that I can`t modify the way that the package was created
I not have commit permission only read , and my comment`s are to leave
this diference clear .
Why If Harbour have a lot of
Revision: 13462
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13462&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-01-03 20:23:24 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-03 21:19 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbqt/hbqt_hbevent
>> What is the point of having 'harbour' package, when
>> nothing useful can be done with it? In any case, hbmk2
>> needs to be moved to utils since it requires libs to
>> work.
>
> naturally there are dependencies between them, also external deps as
> needed.
>
>> Then what is the point of h
Revision: 13461
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13461&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2010-01-03 19:59:32 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-03 11:57 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* contrib/hbxbp/xbpbrowse.prg
Hi
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> Reviewing the changes, is there any particular reasons
> for these ones:
>
>> Modified: trunk/harbour/contrib/hbxbp/xbpbrowse.prg
>> ===
>> --- trunk/harbour/contrib/hbxbp/xbpbrowse.prg2010-01
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> > harbour-utils - hbrun, maybe hbtest
> > libharbour$shlib_version - libharbour{mt,}.so.x.y.z
> > libharbour-dev - *.h, *.api, libharbour{mt,}.so (symlink to &.x.y.z)
> > harbour - harbour, hbmk2, *.ch, other stuff that are directly used
> > when
Hi Pritpal,
On 2010 Jan 3, at 18:32, vouch...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 13460
>
> http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13460&view=rev
> Author: vouchcac
> Date: 2010-01-03 17:32:43 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
>
Hi,
The lowercase conversion:
/home/Istvan/Downloads/harbour/contrib/hbide/
generates the following error on linux:
File not found:
/home/istvan/downloads/harbour/contrib/hbide/hbide.prg
Best regards,
István
___
Harbour mailing l
In harbour-nightly.zip file is errror.
Infotest from win rar in Polish :
! D:\download\harbour\harbour-nightly.zip: Błąd CRC w harbour\win-make.exe.
Plik jest uszkodzony
! D:\download\harbour\harbour-nightly.zip: Archiwum jest uszkodzone
Regards,
Marek Horodyski
>>> /usr should be used only by packages since they know how to clean and
>>> how to manage conflicts.
>>>
>>> make install MUST go elsewhere like /usr/local or /opt/
>>>
>>> Please let's leave to Linux REAL developers rpm and deb packaging issues.
>>
>> This means REAL Linux developers left thi
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> > /usr should be used only by packages since they know how to clean and
> > how to manage conflicts.
> >
> > make install MUST go elsewhere like /usr/local or /opt/
> >
> > Please let's leave to Linux REAL developers rpm and deb packaging issues.
Revision: 13460
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13460&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2010-01-03 17:32:43 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-03 09:22 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* contrib/hbide/hbide.prg
*
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Bruno Luciani wrote:
> And what do you mean About Real developers ?
>
> If you like I don't help anymore
Please don't take it personally, what I meant was simply that, as said
in another thread, packaging is a complex issue and here we have
developers like Przemys
Lorenzo , It is ok for me
I only inform the diference between both releases , .deb an SVN
And what do you mean About Real developers ?
If you like I don't help anymore
Nobody are making the Ubuntu package , and its really easy , at least for me
Bruno
2010/1/3 Lorenzo Fiorini
> On Sun, Ja
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
>> Anyone can change it, but before we do so,
>> it would be good to see why it is setup
>> the way it is now :)
>
> /usr should be used only by packages since they know how to clean and
> how to manage conflicts.
>
> make install MUST g
It's controlled in harbour.spec. Looking at it closely,
we're simply using default values of RPM creator tool.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2010 Jan 3, at 16:59, Bruno Luciani wrote:
> Ok , in which file remains this configuration ?
>
> Bruno
>
> 2010/1/3 Viktor Szakáts
> > I think that both works ok bu
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Anyone can change it, but before we do so,
> it would be good to see why it is setup
> the way it is now :)
/usr should be used only by packages since they know how to clean and
how to manage conflicts.
make install MUST go elsewhere like
This is my Configuration
[ PROPERTIES ]
Type = Executable
Title = Prueba
Location = /home/bruno/harbour_svn/harbour/contrib/hbqt/tests
WorkingFolder = /home/bruno/harbour_svn/harbour/contrib/hbqt/tests
DestinationFolder = /home/bruno/harbour_svn/harbour/contri
this is my right qtdemo.hbi
[ PROPERTIES ]
Type = Executable
Title = qtdemo
Location = c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
WorkingFolder = c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
DestinationFolder = c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
Output= qtdemo
LaunchPar
May be , I don' t know
Bruno
2010/1/3 Massimo Belgrano
> with follow qt demo.hbi i receive different messages (prev posted)
> maj be windows/linux differences?
>
> [ PROPERTIES ]
> Type = Executable
> Title = qtdemo
> Location = c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/project
with follow qt demo.hbi i receive different messages (prev posted)
maj be windows/linux differences?
[ PROPERTIES ]
Type = Executable
Title = qtdemo
Location = c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
WorkingFolder = c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
DestinationFolde
Ok , in which file remains this configuration ?
Bruno
2010/1/3 Viktor Szakáts
> > I think that both works ok but may be its better that the path
> > would be the same in both SVN and .DEB package
> >
> > Who changes this in harbour project ?
>
> Anyone can change it, but before we do so,
> it w
No it is ok
Bruno
2010/1/3 Massimo Belgrano
> Imo you have missing
> Project location: c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
> working folder:c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
>
>
> 2010/1/3 Bruno Luciani
>
>> This is the error , and It's hbqt lib missing
>>
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>> hbmk2: Processi
Ok I try this
Bruno
2010/1/3 Massimo Belgrano
> Imo you have missing
> Project location: c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
> working folder:c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
>
>
> 2010/1/3 Bruno Luciani
>
>> This is the error , and It's hbqt lib missing
>>
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>> hbmk2: Proces
Imo you have missing
Project location: c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
working folder:c:/harbour/contrib/hbide/projects
2010/1/3 Bruno Luciani
> This is the error , and It's hbqt lib missing
>
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> hbmk2: Processing configuration: /usr/local/bin/hbmk.cfg
>
> hbmk2: Harbour compil
This is the error , and It's hbqt lib missing
Bruno
hbmk2: Processing configuration: /usr/local/bin/hbmk.cfg
hbmk2: Harbour compiler command (embedded):
(/usr/local/bin/harbour) -n2
/home/bruno/harbour_svn/harbour/contrib/hbqt/tests/demoqt.prg -q
-i/usr/local/include/harbour
Harbour 2.0.1de
> c:\harbour\contrib\hbide\projects\qtdemo!
I fix this problem here in the morning and soon I'll sending the patch
to list soon.
Vailton Renato
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-proje
afaik hbide incorporate
hbp/hnc and not undestrand c:\harbour\contrib\hbqt\tests\hbmk.hbm
Project: qtdemo
Launch.: Yes
Rebuild: No
Started at 16:28:21
-
hbmk2: Processing environment options: -compiler=mingw
hbmk2: Processing
> I think that both works ok but may be its better that the path
> would be the same in both SVN and .DEB package
>
> Who changes this in harbour project ?
Anyone can change it, but before we do so,
it would be good to see why it is setup
the way it is now :)
Brgds,
Viktor
__
well I try to compile hbqt sample using HBIDE and not works
Bruno
2010/1/3 Vailton Renato
> Hi!
>
> It uses the hbmk2 to build and therefore most common LIBs are already
> incorporated at the time of linking.
>
> Regards,
> Vailton Renato
>
> 2010/1/3 Bruno Luciani :
> > Pritpal
> >
> > Howto a
Hi!
It uses the hbmk2 to build and therefore most common LIBs are already
incorporated at the time of linking.
Regards,
Vailton Renato
2010/1/3 Bruno Luciani :
> Pritpal
>
> Howto add Libs to a project ?
>
> or HBIDE autodetect and add it automatically ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Bruno
>
>
I think that both works ok but may be its better that the path
would be the same in both SVN and .DEB package
Who changes this in harbour project ?
Bruno
PD : thanks for your words I hope too
2010/1/3 Viktor Szakáts
> > No I don' t
> >
> > in SVN make install path is /usr/local
> >
> > and
Pritpal
Howto add Libs to a project ?
or HBIDE autodetect and add it automatically ?
Thanks
Bruno
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
> No I don' t
>
> in SVN make install path is /usr/local
>
> and in Ubuntu .deb package seems to be /usr
>
> When I try ti open the package using Gnome tool Gdebi before install I can
> see the files
> and here the path is /usr/lib /usr/include etc etc
>
> In some moment I ask about
No I don' t
in SVN make install path is /usr/local
and in Ubuntu .deb package seems to be /usr
When I try ti open the package using Gnome tool Gdebi before install I can
see the files
and here the path is /usr/lib /usr/include etc etc
In some moment I ask about /usr/local path install
> I just compiled my version of Harbour 2.0 for UBuntu 9.1
>
> The package works ok , but I see that is diferent the
> install path from this package , that from compilation
> using SVN and make make install.
>
> This is in linux enviroment
>
> It is ok ?
Did you by any chance manually overr
> definitely not.
>
> i think that the proper splitting is something very close to this (as
> i'm primarily familiar with deb, that's what i base the following
> upon, but the general principle applies with most every distro, and to
> some extent ports, pkgsrc, and whatever other packaging meth
I just compiled my version of Harbour 2.0 for UBuntu 9.1
The package works ok , but I see that is diferent the
install path from this package , that from compilation
using SVN and make make install.
This is in linux enviroment
It is ok ?
Bruno
___
H
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> * harbour.spec
> + Merged lib and static subpackages into main one.
oh, i see you did that while i was away typing.
anyway, there's no point in reverting that; currently (by virtue of
rpm/deb being used as a convenience contain
I think you are using this incorrectly.
You must call getlasterror before calling anything else that might set or
reset it. This has nothing to do with ST/MT
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Xavi"
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 12:38 AM
S
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
most things below are just scratching the problem-surface, and
definitely need more eyes.
> I have a pending commit, which merges core + lib + static
> rpms into one. Is this okay?
definitely not.
i think that the proper splitting is something very
Revision: 13459
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13459&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-01-03 13:08:07 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-03 14:07 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbqt/qth/QApplica
Revision: 13458
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13458&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-01-03 12:43:59 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-03 13:40 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* ChangeLog
! Fixed acc
Revision: 13457
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13457&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-01-03 12:28:25 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-03 13:24 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* INSTALL
+ Added OS/2
Hi Tamas,
I'm not offended since I'm not the original author of the .spec
files... I just wanted to help build the RPMs on Suse (both openSuse
and SLE[D|S]) since I have several running systems at work and at home
that I can use to do such builds.
I was trying to understand how these builds worked
Hi
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> True. I'll try to merge them to fix this.
>
HBXBP is also running fine with new protocol.
Just to keep for reference let up retain old proto
for some time, eventually we will delete them.
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.
Follow are my hbide little observation
- Project tree have 5 level IMO better merge with something like
"Project lib" ..a few number of level to make a minor number of click. and
better understanding
- Have collapsed project tree as default (at least first time) so user
can easy
> note it says "packaging policy", not "packaging suggestions".
>
> proper packaging is much more complicated and tricky business than
> most of you can even begin to imagine, and it most certainly isn't
> just "lets shovel a metric shitload of files into an rpm (or deb, or
> anything else, for
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, francesco perillo wrote:
francesco,
honestly this is not intended as an offence, far be from it, but there
are established standards and policies for packaging, which you are
not to reinvent, override or outsmart, but to follow.
opensuse has some nice documentation on packa
Hi
Vailton Renato wrote:
>
> The new window. PPO is very cool. Just I do not discovery how to use
> the Find / Replace, Goto Line and how view the current cursor position
> in this new window and this I felt sorely missed, especially when I'm
> comparing the file. PPO with its original.
>
Yes
is possible also Line numbering ppo?
2010/1/3 Vailton Renato
> Hi Pritpal Bedi!
>
> >! Changed the way .ppo is presented. Now a new modeless
> > window displays .ppo source and thus you have more control
> > over comaprison with original source. You can keep as many
> > such .
Hi Pritpal Bedi!
> ! Changed the way .ppo is presented. Now a new modeless
> window displays .ppo source and thus you have more control
> over comaprison with original source. You can keep as many
> such .ppo windows on the screen.
The new window. PPO is very cool. Just I do not
>> From what I understand, harbour-lib MUST be installed on all systems
> that must run shared compiled Harbour programs.
>
> "core" and "static" are instead for programmers-only... I'd merge
> these two because "static" is required anyway if you compile a shared
> library !
I agree to merge.
hb
-devel packages include files that permit to extend core functionalities...
python-devel: Include Files and Libraries Mandatory for Building Python Modules
I don't agree to have a harbour-devel.. .gcc doesn't have a -devel...
it has a "compiler package" taht includes almost everything...
>From wh
Revision: 13456
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13456&view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2010-01-03 11:02:26 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-03 03:00 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* contrib/hbide/hbide.prg
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, francesco perillo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, francesco perillo wrote:
> >
> > > harbour-static contains the .a libraries
> >
> > doesn't suse name these kinds of packages -devel, like any
> > rpm system with go
Hi David,
> Second try: Enable contrib\hbqt in OS/2
> Changing in contrib\hbqt\detect.mk
> #DAVID: _DET_FLT_PLAT := !dos !os2
> _DET_FLT_PLAT := !dos
> It request HB_QT_MOC_BIN
>
> Third try: Enable HB_QT_MOC_BIN
> set HB_QT_MOC_BIN=e:\qt451b5\bin
HB_QT_MOC_BIN should be set to the moc binary,
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, francesco perillo wrote:
>
> > harbour-static contains the .a libraries
>
> doesn't suse name these kinds of packages -devel, like any
> rpm system with good manners does?
Well, I will check with other "compiler" packages
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, francesco perillo wrote:
> harbour-static contains the .a libraries
doesn't suse name these kinds of packages -devel, like any
rpm system with good manners does?
--
[-]
mkdir /nonexistent
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment siz
Hi,
> I will start over later today.
>
> I want just to say that I did not use HB_*_INSTALL overrides when
> building rpm...
>
> It is true that I used HB_*_INSTAL in a previous "make; make install"
> style compilation that I used to check which files were compiled but
> it was in another termin
> vszakats wrote:
>>
>> Revision: 13449
>>
>> http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13449&view=rev
>> Author: vszakats
>> Date: 2010-01-03 01:13:53 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
>>
>
> After building clean I get these errors while linking demoqt:
>
> Generating C sou
I will start over later today.
I want just to say that I did not use HB_*_INSTALL overrides when
building rpm...
It is true that I used HB_*_INSTAL in a previous "make; make install"
style compilation that I used to check which files were compiled but
it was in another terminal session
The R
Revision: 13455
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13455&view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-01-03 10:03:50 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-03 11:00 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbqt/generator/hb
Hi!
There is a small adjustment that needs to be done so that the command
CloseSource to run properly. I am posting here the diff of the code
snippet changed to avoid having to post all your content ... If you
can not take this diff let me know that I send you the full sources of
functions updated
Hi
vszakats wrote:
>
> Revision: 13449
>
> http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13449&view=rev
> Author: vszakats
> Date: 2010-01-03 01:13:53 + (Sun, 03 Jan 2010)
>
After building clean I get these errors while linking demoqt:
Generating C sourc
Hi
vszakats wrote:
>
> ; Pritpal, can you please review this method?
>
Demoqt runs fine. We need to add one more line
just before Qt_Events_connect() as
oWnd:installEventFilter( s_events )
But I am unable to receive events for hbxbp.
Slots seems to be working ok but events are not
bein
On 2010 Jan 3, at 07:39, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
> David Arturo Macias Corona wrote:
>>
>> ../../../hbqt_hbdbfmodel.cpp:108: error: conversion from `BOOL' to `const
>> QVariant' is ambiguous
>>
>>
>> E:/Qt451B5/src/corelib/kernel/qvariant.h:182: error:
>> QVariant::QVariant(bool)
83 matches
Mail list logo
