On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> Before I read through your mail, let me note this is group
> work, and while I'm familiar with some parts of it, I'm
> not with some others, and no such implications (namely
> the tie in between lib name and dir name in core) were
> visible (or noticed b
Hi, Mindaugas
> /*
> TODO: BCC compiler error???!!!
> I had a situation when without this donothing() call the whole loop is
not
> executed?! Really, strange! Do we have BCC error here? I hadn't time to
do
> CPU level debugging, but an extra function call influences generated CPU
> code
2008-02-07 20:17 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/config/lib.cf
* moved some definitions for easier detecting library build mode
* harbour/config/os2/dir.cf
* harbour/config/os2/global.cf
* some modifications which should help for old GNU make OS2 ports
2008/2/7 Przemyslaw Czerpak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And please also look for someone who will continue release process.
> I'm afraid that I do not have more time for it.
What about a new project without any calendar or binaries release,
where the only output is the svn checkout or "optionally" tar
Maurilio:
>That said, I think that your problems come from the use of a build >system
>which is not uptodate.
>You can, but I fear you have different problems, look at xharbour OS/2
>.cf
>files which work ok.
Harbour under OS/2 was building fine until some days ago, but now it is
failing. He
Hi Przemek,
Before I read through your mail, let me note this is group
work, and while I'm familiar with some parts of it, I'm
not with some others, and no such implications (namely
the tie in between lib name and dir name in core) were
visible (or noticed by anyone), before the fact. I don't
Przemek:
>2008-02-07 11:24 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
> * harbour/config/os2/gcc.cf
>* use OS2_LIB_ARCH as library name to avoid problems with DEL
> * harbour/config/os2/global.cf
>* use double backslash characters - hack to test if it's sufficient
> worka
David,
[...]
- As seen, Marek changes does not touch this case
My changes are not related to "standard build system" at all.
They have not corrected anything related to your testings,
because they were dine in "an alternative build system".
[...]
But seem Marek was building Harbour OK usin
Marek:
>Funny, but after installing this build I had "moztools" directory
>installed and "used" (I mean it was in PATH environment).
If I remember well, moztools are created in installation of eCS, but
there are some updates. Surely Paul Smedley environment have it
>Well, it seems you were us
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> Sorry but I don't find it normal that we're distributing
> header files from other packages. This can be quite unsafe,
> needs constant maintenance, gives the notion these are local
> file, and they get locally modified eventually (they in fact
> got mod
Przemek:
Seem previous message was refused due length of make_gnu.log (until now
it not appear on Harbour list)
This copy contain a short make_gnu.log
Please see CORRECTION section, perhaps you need to review your previous
changes (workaround for 'if')
lib\os2, lib\os2\gcc are created in a l
David,
>Well, truely speaking I do not use OS/2 :). I simply had
>a chance to access an OS/2 system on my friend's computer.
>He bought OS/2 long ago (he says he payed too much for it
>;-)) and still has an old machine running OS/2 - because
>of a sentiment - I guess for the money he payed
Maurilio,
not to start a dispute on this issue, but while it is true that IBM is no more
selling OS/2 to end-users, the OS, for end-users, is now on the hands of the
eComStation guys which are doing a really good work in enhancing/supporting
it.
You can go to www.ecomstation.com to see.
No do
2008-02-07 11:24 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/config/os2/gcc.cf
* use OS2_LIB_ARCH as library name to avoid problems with DEL
* harbour/config/os2/global.cf
* use double backslash characters - hack to test if it's sufficient
workaround for problem
Marek:
>Well, truely speaking I do not use OS/2 :). I simply had
>a chance to access an OS/2 system on my friend's computer.
>He bought OS/2 long ago (he says he payed too much for it
>;-)) and still has an old machine running OS/2 - because
>of a sentiment - I guess for the money he payed ;-).
Marek,
not to start a dispute on this issue, but while it is true that IBM is no more
selling OS/2 to end-users, the OS, for end-users, is now on the hands of the
eComStation guys which are doing a really good work in enhancing/supporting
it.
You can go to www.ecomstation.com to see.
That said,
16 matches
Mail list logo
