please ignore
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour
>
> I have to say that I don't like the idea to get the query result and put it
> into a .dbf file (like sqlite3 for xharbour does); and given the ability of
> sqlite to step through the query it could be possible to handle a big result
> without creating a huge array (or a huge .dbf).
>
> My 2c
I made some test with hbpgsql on Linux i found with the
harbour/contrib/hbpgsql/tests/test.prg
to make test.prg working with postgresql 8.x i must change the row:
res := PQexec('drop table products')
to
res := PQexec(conn, 'drop table products')
res := PQexec('create table products ( product_n
Hi Przemek,
Solved, thank you a lot.
Jorge A.
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:35:55 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: harbour@harbour-project.org
> Subject: [Harbour] 2008-01-14 19:35 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak
> (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
>
> 2008-01-14 19:35 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpa
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Randy Portnoff wrote:
> Hi Przemek,
> > * harbour/source/rdd/dbcmd.c
> >* changed hb_retnl() in LASTREC() to hb_retnint() to increase maximum
> > record number to 2^32 - unsigned 32bit integer instead of signed one.
> Do any of the other record-related functions need
Hi Przemek,
* harbour/source/rdd/dbcmd.c
* changed hb_retnl() in LASTREC() to hb_retnint() to increase maximum
record number to 2^32 - unsigned 32bit integer instead of signed one.
Do any of the other record-related functions need to be updated also?
(eg. DBGOTO()/GO, RECNO(), DBR
2008-01-14 19:35 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/common.mak
* replaced TAB with SPACEs
* harbour/source/rdd/dbcmd.c
* changed hb_retnl() in LASTREC() to hb_retnint() to increase maximum
record number to 2^32 - unsigned 32bit integer instead of signe
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Jorge A. Giraldo wrote:
> Hi Przemek,
> I don't have SIX3, but I am reading the guides in
> http://www.ousob.com/ng/six3/index.php
> DBFdecrypt doesn't use a parameter as you said.
> As I can see I should use SetPass instead.
> But at least for me this code doesn't work,
> the
Przemyslaw,
I stand corrected! :)
Thanks.
Maurilio.
Przemyslaw Czerpak ha scritto:
>
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote:
> > PS. But, if you have more than 2 billion records... how big is that .dbf? I
> > think .dbf has a 2Gb size limit.
>
> 1. It's not DBF - Jacke wa talking about M
Maurilio Longo wrote:
>
> But, :some_var could be a problem because it is the way in which you
> reference
> a method property inside a with object clause.
>
> So, maybe, we could end up with a different prefix which is then
> translated in
> the .c low level interface.
>
> I mean
>
> with o
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Chen Kedem wrote:
> Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> > sx_DBFdecrypt() does not accept password as parameter but uses
> > current table password
> According to source/rdd/hbsix/sxtable.c, both SX_DBFENCRYPT()
> and SX_DBFDECRYPT() get one paramter which is used as the password
> lat
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Maurilio Longo wrote:
> PS. But, if you have more than 2 billion records... how big is that .dbf? I
> think .dbf has a 2Gb size limit.
1. It's not DBF - Jacke wa talking about MEDNTX RDD which uses
SQL tables
2. DBF does not have 2GB size limits and never had. It was only M
[poniedziałek, 14 styczeń 2008], Jacek Potempa napisał(a):
> Hi All,
> One of our customers have just hit a limit of possible number of records
> in a single table. This limit is a 32-bit "signed int" which gives us
> 2,147,483,647 records per table. It's the maximum value HB_IT_LONG can
> hold
These are the function skeletons in original SX3 docs:
Sx_DBFencrypt( [cKey] ) -> Logical
Sx_DBFdecrypt() -> Logical
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.01.14., at 15:45, Chen Kedem wrote:
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
sx_DBFdecrypt() does not accept password as parameter but uses
current table password
Acco
Hi Przemek,
I don't have SIX3, but I am reading the guides in
http://www.ousob.com/ng/six3/index.php
DBFdecrypt doesn't use a parameter as you said. As I can see I should use
SetPass instead. But at least for me this code doesn't work, the table remains
encrypted, sorry if I miss something:
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> sx_DBFdecrypt() does not accept password as parameter but uses
> current table password
According to source/rdd/hbsix/sxtable.c, both SX_DBFENCRYPT()
and SX_DBFDECRYPT() get one paramter which is used as the password
later in source/rdd/dbf1.c hb_TableCrypt()
I don't h
Petr,
I do understand only right now that _you_ wrote minigui sqlite interface! :)
I think that we could restrict what is accepted by this new bind_all()
function.
In particular we could say that it works only for the :some_var type of
place-holder.
But, :some_var could be a problem because it
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Jorge A. Giraldo wrote:
> Hi All,
> The following code will encrypt a file, but will not decrypt it
> (Only de header as long as I can see).
> When encrypted, the name becomes unreadable...
Have you tested this code with Clipper and SIX3?
It gives the same results. sx_DBFdecr
Maurilio Longo wrote:
>
>
> I think it would be better, if possible, to have a single call to which we
> pass all the variables needed for a query and which does the binding,
> something like
>
> text into csql
>insert into t1( name, age) values( :name, :age )
> endtext
>
> (here the col
On Jan 14, 2008 11:06 AM, Maurilio Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then, having a good low level api we can add a higher level object class to
> handle the result from the query.
This can be a start. We can create ONE low level hbsqlite.c and call
it from differents high level interfaces.
> I
Another implemtation;
This is implementation the API Sqlite 3 for compilers [x]Harbour.
Copyright 2007 WenSheng
Copyright 2007 Rafa Carmona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
License: Library General Public License (GNU)
* Based in job of :
Copyright 2003 Alejandro de Gárate <[EMAIL PROT
Lorenzo Fiorini-2 wrote:
>
>
> There is a wrapper for Harbour at
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Board/5300/sqlite/hbsqlite_en.htm
> but it's not updated.
>
>
Maybe you can see and other solution:
SQLite3 for xHarbour(*mdy:2007.10.19) version 3.5.1
http://www4.zzz.com.tw/phpbb2/vi
Hi,
so we have at least three different .c bindings; at a first sight it seems to
me that hwgui low level api bindings is the best one.
but it has a few sqlite3_bind_xxx() functions to bind values to a prepared
query which are 'ugly' to use.
I think it would be better, if possible, to have a sin
On Jan 14, 2008 9:34 AM, Petr Chornyj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you can see and other solution:
Thanks for the info.
best regards,
Lorenzo
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/h
David,
I've removed it in xharbour, just look at xharbour hbdefs.h
best regards.
Maurilio.
David Arturo Macias Corona ha scritto:
>
> Przemek:
>
> This is a request/answer I made to Maurilio Longo recently:
>
> ---
> > > On other subject:
> > > xharbou
25 matches
Mail list logo
