Understood! Thank you very much for the clarification!
On 4/15/25 17:23, Aurelien DARRAGON wrote:
Hi,
On 4/15/25 19:45, Camila Camargo de Matos wrote:
Dear HAProxy team,
I write to you today to ask more about the issue being described in the
following commit:
https://git.haproxy.org/?
p=hapr
Hello William,
Thank you for your patience and valuable feedback and reviews. Appreciate it.
As you requested, I have
broken the changes into 3 seperate patches to help with the review process. The
first patch contains the
4 new fetches + the doc changes as I had originally submitted (with all
---
reg-tests/checks/tcp-check-client-hello.vtc | 81 +
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 reg-tests/checks/tcp-check-client-hello.vtc
diff --git a/reg-tests/checks/tcp-check-client-hello.vtc
b/reg-tests/checks/tcp-check-client-hello.vtc
new file mode 100644
This patch contains the 4 new fetches and doc changes for the new fetches.
Towards:#2532
---
doc/configuration.txt | 66 ++
src/payload.c | 507 ++
2 files changed, 573 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt
i
Add new smp_client_hello_parse() function to parse client hello and uses it in
every fetch.
Modified the following existing fetches to use this new parsing function to do
the initial parsing,
while the client extension processing are done within the fetches itself:
- smp_fetch_req_ssl_st_ext
-
5 matches
Mail list logo