пн, 28 окт. 2024 г. в 17:55, Aleksandar Lazic :
> Hi.
>
> I have asked about a updated Perfomance tests and got in the GH comment
> the
> performance link.
>
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/20286#issuecomment-2433509052
> => https://openssl-library.org/performance.html
>
> Have anybody
in the commit
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/98099287ee37e697d1d2aaf01e19107bd064c3c6
building docker was switched to URL, but I forgotten to change context.
this is a followup fix.
---
.github/workflows/quic-interop-libressl.yml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hello Ilya,
I think you mixed up both patches, one commentary is about libreSSL but contains
the aws-lc file, and the contrary for the other one.
Regards,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 09:49:01PM +0100, Ilia Shipitsin wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] CI: switch QUIC Interop on LibreSSL to common docker
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:42:45PM +0100, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] CI: switch QUIC Interop on LibreSSL to common docker
> image
> ср, 30 окт. 2024 г. в 16:33, William Lallemand :
>
> > Hello Ilya,
> >
> > I think you mixed up both patches, one commentary is about libreSSL bu
ср, 30 окт. 2024 г. в 16:33, William Lallemand :
> Hello Ilya,
>
> I think you mixed up both patches, one commentary is about libreSSL but
> contains
> the aws-lc file, and the contrary for the other one.
>
yep. If you do not mind, can you fix it when applying ?
or I can send v2
>
> Regards,
>
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 07:27:52PM +0100, Ilia Shipitsin wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] CI: LibreSSL QUIC Interop: fix docker context
> in the commit
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/98099287ee37e697d1d2aaf01e19107bd064c3c6
> building docker was switched to URL, but I forgotten to change con
6 matches
Mail list logo
