n unknown file:
0 (%resolve-variable (5 (gnu packages bash) bash-minimal .
ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable:
error: bash-minimal: unbound variable
So I'm probably doing something bad.
Seems like the first variable in the "inputs" fails to resolve
somewhere? I don't even
Hi Nicolas
Isn't what you're trying to do already in Guix? Have a look at
package-inputs-rewrite right there :
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Defining-Package-Variants.html
I want to have this but more powerful, I'd like to do something like
define an operating system with all
In the code there, the function propagate-packages will indeed try and
propagate every package through the graph node.
I looked at your code, it's comprehensive. I wasn't sure such a thing
was possible with input rewriting, although I think there's still a lot
of benefit to the functional approa
The main turn-off people cite to me is our association with GNU. As a
particularly poignant case study, in conversations with someone who has
contributed significantly to Guix on my recommendation and did not stay around,
the primary complaint was not the email-based workflow (which was noted a
On 7/2/25 1:40 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello,
Ekaitz Zarraga writes:
So yeah, spacecadet, if you really want to continue to package it, we
would add it to Guix, I don't think there's any policy in Guix against
it (unless their documentation or so is also part of the p
hi guix
I've been working on packaging the xlibre-server
https://gitlab.vulnix.sh/spacecadet/guix-xlibre
there's no new service type, just helper macros and functions like
(xlibre-configuration ...) or (xorg-configuration->xlibre-configuration ...)
that rewrite the xorg ser
On 8/2/25 11:09 AM, pinoaffe wrote:
against their attacks, against their discrimination
what attacks?
On 7/31/25 11:09 PM, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
But here we are talking about maintainers specifically discriminating
people in very violent ways, during their role as a maintainer, so we
probably all agree that this is way too dangerous, and that this is
bad, and that it needs to be avoided.
On 8/1/25 4:42 PM, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Just for the record, I don't know if it was the maintainer, but I believe it
was, that came to this mailing list and insulted some people (myself included).
this mailing list? I'd be surprised, could have been a troll or a schizo,
there's been a handfu
