On Tue, Mar 18 2025, Rutherther wrote:
>> As fuel for thought, we have https://issues.guix.gnu.org/27155 from
>> 2017 which creates a finalization mechanism for any service type, but
>> it built on the idea of explicit extension points which would limit
>> what a finalizer can do to whatever a serv
Aha! I get it now, thanks for clarifying.
I am not against anything here, any presented solution in either the issue or
here seems good imo.
Still, I would like to bring one consideration into account in case the
finalization cannot be made from other service. Since you mentioned NixOS, I
will
Hello all; regarding dystopian direction;
Christine Lemmer-Webber writes:
> The modularity of the Reform design is the most hope I have for a FOSS
> future on the otherwise largely dystopian direction of hardware lately.
> Hopefully we will get better and better options over time for the SoCs
> t
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 18:09, Simon Tournier wrote:
> This GCD can be now considered as *submitted*. The date for the
> submission date will be the one when you will send the announce; see
> “Communication Channels” section.
Almost one month is over. For the record, the discussion happens
This is good news, to myself and I am sure many others who are either
using or hopeful for the future of the Reform.
I am really happy to see not only the progress but that there may be a
way to have the majority of work in Guix itself (even if there's the
"cheat" in there to make things functiona
Christine Lemmer-Webber writes:
> This is good news, to myself and I am sure many others who are either
> using or hopeful for the future of the Reform.
>
> I am really happy to see not only the progress but that there may be a
> way to have the majority of work in Guix itself (even if there's th
Hi Guix!
Each build-system sets its own imported-modules and modules, but in the
case where we would want to generalize a function which takes a
build-system in its arguments, there doesn't seem to be a way to access
the imported-modules and modules from this build-system. (I have a
specific use-c
Hello Carlo,
thank you for tackling this issue,
imo it's a super useful feature to be able to change (shepherd)
services after they are made.
> As fuel for thought, we have https://issues.guix.gnu.org/27155 from 2017
> which creates a finalization mechanism for any service type, but it
> built
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:50:35 +0800,
Hilton Chain wrote:
>
> New changes:
>
> importer: Added a simple test for lockfile importer.
>
> importer: Added short option for ‘--lockfile’: ‘-f’, with a space, shell will
> pass expanded file name to importer.
>
> importer: Error out when lockfile doesn't ex
Greetings,
Another report on my process. I tried to make and build many different
versions of webkitgtk, including webkit-for-gtk3@2.41.91,
webkitgtk@2.41.91, and webkitgtk-with-libsoup2@2.41.91,
webkit-for-gtk3@2.40.5 (latest version in Guix before 2.42), only to
discover that I actually can't bu
On 2025-03-17, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2025-03-17, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> And submitted a patch:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/77090
>
> And already made one minor improvement:
>
>
> https://codeberg.org/vagrantc/guix/commit/56d1311324a410047385366df24d152c822e28a1
And a pull requ
Hi Greg,
Greg Hogan writes:
We have a C++ team! Has the survey shown that project
contributors are
happier when members of a team and those patches reviewed more
promptly?
I find Guix to be a powerful tool with unbounded
potential. Thank you to
all who have contributed. My particular use h
12 matches
Mail list logo
