Re: Waylandify all the qt-using packages - need help

2025-02-17 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Noé, Noé Lopez via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > Hi dannym, > > Would it make sense to add qt-wayland to the qt-build-system directly? I think that would make sense yes, in this Wayland era. -- Thanks, Maxim

Re: [GCD] Rename “main” branch

2025-02-17 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Hi, I'm replying mainly to restore the thread's subject line back from ‘none’. Z572, please try to keep an eye out for this if this is something your MUA likes to do. Anyway, the ‘guix time-machine --{commit,branch}’ thing would need to be tested before/if the GCD is accepted, but should not

Re: On a Guile-based Build-Tool complimenting Guix

2025-02-17 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Olivier, Olivier Dion writes: > On Sat, 28 Dec 2024, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Olivier Dion skribis: >> >>> For what it is worth, I have been using my own build system purely in >>> Guile for a few years now. I use it in my main project libpatch >>> (https://git.sr.ht/~old/lib

Re: [bug#55231] Understanding #:substitutable? and #55231

2025-02-17 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Leo, Morgan, all, Morgan Arnold via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > Hi Leo, > >> If Maxime's concern is that Guix should not make it too easy for users >> to distribute software for which they do not have the license, I hear >> that concern, but I argue th

Re: Libravatar avatars on mumi

2025-02-17 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Arun, Arun Isaac writes: > Hi, > > We now have Libravatar[1] avatars on mumi thanks to Felix Lechner and > Noé Lopez! For those who don't have Libravatar avatars, we fall back to > identicons[2]. Libravatar federation is not implemented yet in > guile-avatar and may be a good project for some

Re: On a Guile-based Build-Tool complimenting Guix

2025-02-17 Thread Divya Ranjan
To keep others in the loop, Olivier and I had a discussion off-the-list on such a build tool. Soon we'd be creating a rudimentary repository and experimenting the tool with different packages. Hopefully we can come up with some interesting outcomes that can be used upstream for Guix. Regards.

Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

2025-02-17 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi, Leo Famulari writes: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:08:22PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> > All these commits before v0.16 could be archived. And the “new” >> > repository would start at this 4a0b87f0ec5b6c2dcf82b372dd20ca7ea6acdd9c. >> > >> > This would save some resource that are downl

Re: none

2025-02-17 Thread Saku Laesvuori
> > My main concern is whether it will affect guix time-machine. > > Will the master branch be removed after the migration to the > > main > > branch on some time, or will it just stay there? > > Good question. > > ... > > I don’t think removing the master branch would break most uses of > `gui

is the certbot service broken?

2025-02-17 Thread Attila Lendvai
hi, i either misunderstand something, or it is the certbot service that has invalid assumtions. two years ago i came to the same conclusion: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/62491#2 Giovanni Biscuolo (CC'd) sent me to guix-devel to discuss this, even though i think the above bug happens because of

Re: renaming of fpga.scm module

2025-02-17 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Cayetano, Andreas Enge writes: > Am Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 10:11:17AM +0100 schrieb Cayetano Santos: >> Two options at this point: we keep on happily dropping loosely related >> packages somewhere (is that a problem, after all ?); or we create a new >> team (if there is interest on participatin

Re: [GCD] Rename “main” branch

2025-02-17 Thread Robby Zambito
Hello, As this effort is primarily driven by social factors, I would like to remind folks of the social events surrounding the original shift from master to other primary branch names (usually main). This effort originated at Microsoft's GitHub, with the expressed effort to be more inclusive wi

Re: [GCD] Rename “main” branch

2025-02-17 Thread Tomas Volf
On February 15, 2025 10:26:53 AM GMT+01:00, Simon Tournier wrote: >Hi Liliana, all, > >On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 09:42, Liliana Marie Prikler > wrote: > >> sponsors: > >Please note that this thread is not for discussing the proposal but for >looking for Sponsor. :-) So, ugh, people started to disc

Re: [GCD] Rename “main” branch

2025-02-17 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
On 17 February 2025 17:40:45 UTC, Vivien Kraus wrote: >Maybe we could be a bit more explicit instead of “may be perceived as >harmful”, if the case needs to be made stronger. For instance, “the >current default, “master”, evokes a metaphor for a political >organization based on inequality. This is

Re: [GCD] Rename “main” branch

2025-02-17 Thread Vivien Kraus
Hello! Le samedi 15 février 2025 à 09:42 +0100, Liliana Marie Prikler a écrit : > Recent versions of Git support arbitrary initial branches and the > default > branch name is subject to change upstream, at least in part because > the > current default — “master” — may be perceived as harmful.  In

Re: [bug#55231] Understanding #:substitutable? and #55231

2025-02-17 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Maxim, > It's not good to surprise user expectations in such a way, especially if > it can expose them to legal problems (no matter how unlikely). > > I hope that helps put a light on what the remaining issue is, which > should be fixed (in my opinion) before #55231 can be merged. I am inclin

Re: node-team / bootstrapping node packages

2025-02-17 Thread Nicolas Graves
A little addition : tree-sitter-build-system supports cross-compilation, but node-build-system doesn't seem to support it ; it can probably be a useful goal to plan this. Nicolas On 2025-02-13 14:53, Jelle Licht wrote: > > A nonexhaustive list of things that could already be rolled into the no

Re: is the certbot service broken?

2025-02-17 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Attila, On Mon, Feb 17 2025, Attila Lendvai wrote: > the challenge response is saved to the wrong path I did not research your claim but Certbot has been working fine for me ever since I started using Guix. [1] I just added two more certificates last night. Please note that my code requires

Re: The next release

2025-02-17 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello, I think something we need to do urgently is to run an ungrafting process - grafting takes a considerable amount of time when updating my system now, and I suppose it will also waste a bit of space. We should not burden the installation process with it. Did we not have a jobset on ci to aut

Re: [GCD] Rename “main” branch

2025-02-17 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Vivien, On Mon, Feb 17 2025, Vivien Kraus wrote: > Maybe we could be a bit more explicit instead of “may be perceived as > harmful”, if the case needs to be made stronger. For instance, “the > current default, “master”, evokes a metaphor for a political > organization based on inequality. See

Re: G-Golf in Guix - G-Golf pkg(s) name(s)

2025-02-17 Thread David Pirotte
Hello Ian, > You don’t need to be a member to send a patch. Changes need to go > through the guix-patches list and debugs. Please see `guix > (Contributing)' in the Guix manual[1] for the process to follow. Ok, I will send a patch to guix-patches then. > Since this is library code, other pac

Re: [GCD] Rename “main” branch

2025-02-17 Thread Tomas Volf
Vivien Kraus writes: > Hello! > > Le samedi 15 février 2025 à 09:42 +0100, Liliana Marie Prikler a > écrit : >> Recent versions of Git support arbitrary initial branches and the >> default >> branch name is subject to change upstream, at least in part because >> the >> current default — “master”