Hello Guix!,
Consider a minimal test git repository [1] created in line with Cookbook
recommendations [2]. It has the following file structure:
.
├── content
├── .guix-channel
├── guix.scm → .guix/modules/test-repo-package.scm
└── .guix
└── modules
└─
Felix Lechner skribis:
> Okay, then there is still another problem. I am unable to reconfigure
> my systems via 'guix deploy' when a timer is enabled already. I am
> trying to add a second timer.
[...]
>(start #~(make-timer-constructor
> ;; Every first Sunday of the month at
Hello!
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> I recently pushed a ‘wip-syslogd’ branch in the Shepherd, which should
> be ready to merge in ‘devel’ in the coming days. It implements an
> in-process “system log” service that does the same job as good’ol
> syslogd as currently used in Guix System (info "(ine
Hello Nigko. Do I understand correctly: Your grievance is the
definition of `local-file', which for relative paths like "../.." does
not follow symlinks to non-directory files, but should? And this is
because current-source-directory returns the wrong path in a Guix
channel?
That is, `local-file
Hello Florian,
There is no grievance for anything. Sorry, if my message has such
a tinge, it does not correspond to what was meant. Also I do not
think that 'local-file' is doing something wrong. I suspect that
introducing changes to such an ubiquitous procedure on such a minor
subject is not nec
"Jonathan Frederickson" writes:
> Guix accepting substitutes from servers without trusted signing keys if the
> same substitutes are available bit-for-bit on a trusted substitute server
> felt like it could be a hint at something. But your trusted build servers
> need to have built a package an
Ahh I had misunderstood. Your intention was just that others with the
same use-case find your workaround in the mail archives. Then you did
right. The guix-cookbook describes a (local-file "."), not "../..", so
I guess it needs no changes, or should we add a hint not to ..?
Regards,
Florian
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
Your intention was just that others with the
same use-case find your workaround in the mail archives. Then you did
right.
Not just this, but also that somebody may consider changing the cookbook.
The guix-cookbook describes a (local-file "."), not "../..",
Ok, I'll try to reproduce with as few packages as I can. I'm working on a
script to test performance of only the "building profile" stage with
various numbers of packages.
I use an relatively new NVME SSD from Samsung. I got it a couple years ago.
I'll have to check back on its read/write performan
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Sergio Pastor Pérez wrote:
> Wouldn't it be enough to have a few independent seeders that have the
> same derivation output? We could have a field in the p2p service type
> which allows the user to configure a "level of trust", where the user
> specifies the minim
10 matches
Mail list logo
