QA is back, who wants to review patches?

Hey! After substitute availability taking a bit of a dive recently, the bordeaux build farm has finally caught back up and QA is back submitting builds for packages changed by patches. QA also has a feature to allow easily tagging patches (issues) as having been reviewed and ready to merge (revie

Re: On the road to the next release: testing the installer

Hi Guix, Here is the report of my first attempt at reinstalling Guix System in a rally long time! Quoting Tanguy LE CARROUR (2024-02-06 13:52:31) > Quoting Tanguy LE CARROUR (2024-02-06 08:31:39) > > In order to test the latest installer, I went to the "latest download" > > page [1] and clic

Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?

On Fri, Feb 09 2024, Christopher Baines wrote: > After substitute availability taking a bit of a dive recently, the > bordeaux build farm has finally caught back up and QA is back submitting > builds for packages changed by patches. > > QA also has a feature to allow easily tagging patches (issues

Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?

Hi Chris, First of, thanks (again) for everything that you’ve done with QA! It looks great! Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 11:44:11) > Let me know if you have any comments or questions! Unfortunately, I have some (stupid) questions! I decided to give it a try and I picked at random a p

Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?

Tanguy LE CARROUR writes: > Hi Chris, > > First of, thanks (again) for everything that you’ve done with QA! > It looks great! > > > Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 11:44:11) >> Let me know if you have any comments or questions! > > Unfortunately, I have some (stupid) questions! > > I deci

Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?

Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 14:44:25) > Tanguy LE CARROUR writes: > > Can I safely close it?! > > Yep, this unfortunately looks like a case where there was a duplication > of effort and the original patch got ignored. > > It looks like the issue has been closed now. Not me! 😁 Regard

Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?

Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 02:53:59PM +0100 schrieb Tanguy LE CARROUR: > Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 14:44:25) > > Tanguy LE CARROUR writes: > > > Can I safely close it?! > > > > Yep, this unfortunately looks like a case where there was a duplication > > of effort and the original patch g

Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?

Hello, I see a few "Failed to process revision", for instance here: https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/68778 While I am not sure why, these look like transient (?) build failures, at least failures not related to the patch in question. What is there to do? Andreas

Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?

Quoting Andreas Enge (2024-02-09 15:30:44) > Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 02:53:59PM +0100 schrieb Tanguy LE CARROUR: > > Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 14:44:25) > > > Tanguy LE CARROUR writes: > > > > Can I safely close it?! > > > > > > Yep, this unfortunately looks like a case where there w

Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches?

Andreas Enge writes: > I see a few "Failed to process revision", for instance here: >https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/68778 > While I am not sure why, these look like transient (?) build failures, > at least failures not related to the patch in question. What is there to do? Long term it would

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Skyler Ferris writes: > On 2/6/24 05:39, Steve George wrote: >> I agreed to organise some 'patch review' online sessions in the next couple >> of >> weeks. >> >> Organising a basic process is a good topic for that online session. For >> example, elsewhere in the thread someone mentions some ta

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Hello, Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 05:35:44PM +0100 schrieb Edouard Klein: > Am Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 07:56:48PM + schrieb Skyler Ferris: > > I'd like to do my part to keep the project in a good state. However, I > > am new to interacting with large FLOSS projects so I'm nervous about > > causing m