Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

Hi, Christopher Baines skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a >> bit confused by the numbers in this example: >> >> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/58186 >> >> The numbers before/after patches don’t match and the lint warnin

Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?

Hi, Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > In my scenario I have two machines, one building stuff the other only > substituting. The serving machine would be the one deciding whether to > enforce substitutability or not. An is it too expensive for that machine to build grafts locally? Ludo’.

Re: Advanced network configuration

Hi Alexey, (Cc: Julien, author of Guile-Netlink.) Alexey Abramov skribis: > 1. I have servers with multiple network cards. Let's say, the management > one and production. both network cards have multiple interfaces, which I > need to bond into 803.1ad mode. Management bond has a native vlan whe

Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Christopher Baines skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a >>> bit confused by the numbers in this example: >>> >>> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/58186 >>> >>> The numbers before/afte

Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> In my scenario I have two machines, one building stuff the other only >> substituting. The serving machine would be the one deciding whether to >> enforce substitutability or not. > > An is it too expensive for that machine to build graft

Re: Notes from discussion on Quality Assurance from the 10 Years of Guix event

Hi Chris, Quoting Christopher Baines (2022-09-18 17:55:30) > Here are some notes I took during the discussion on patch review/quality > assurance at the 10 Years of Guix event. Thanks for the notes! After months not contributing, today, I've started contributing patches again! Seems like I've f

Re: Notes from discussion on Quality Assurance from the 10 Years of Guix event

Tanguy LE CARROUR writes: >> - Minimise the burden for submitters >> - Lengthy guidance for submitting patches > > Actually, the `16.4 Packaging Guidelines` and `16.6 Submitting Patches` > are everything that I've ever looked for. I think the point here is that the Submitting Patches sect

Maintainers meeting notes.

Hello, For the last six months or so, the maintainers have been conducting monthly meetings on Jami. They are scheduled every first Tuesday of the month. It is often the occasion to plan some actions and discuss the administration of the build farm. The meeting notes are available here: https:

Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

October 1, 2022 1:08 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > Hello! > > As discussed in Paris, I’m a big fan of qa.guix.gnu.org! I like that it > shows all the information relevant to packagers and reviewers in a > concise way. > > I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a >

Re: enter debugger on failure

Testing