Hi, Christopher Baines <m...@cbaines.net> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > >> I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a >> bit confused by the numbers in this example: >> >> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/58186 >> >> The numbers before/after patches don’t match and the lint warnings (nice >> addition!) appear to unrelated to the patch at hand. >> >> Any idea what’s going on? > > I've had an initial look. One important clue is that the basis of the > comparison [1] differs between data.qa.guix.gnu.org and > data.guix.gnu.org [2]. The package number differs for example. > > 1: > https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/revision/e6777cfa5eb5e9c36eaf7810b42cac0fbcaa367c > 2: https://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/e6777cfa5eb5e9c36eaf7810b42cac0fbcaa367c > > That shouldn't happen, one revision of Guix should have the same number > of packages regardless of what server looked at it. This being wrong > explains the bad data on qa.guix.gnu.org, since the comparison being > done by data.qa.guix.gnu.org is based on bad data. OK, I see. BTW, why do we have both data.qa.guix and data.guix? These are both instances of the same service, right? Thanks, Ludo’.
