Thanks Amirouche,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:38:56PM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> On 2018-08-30 20:20, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> > Just to clarify, we will organize a two day Guix conference before
> > FOSDEM. That is pretty much in the box. We have room at ICAB, the place
> > we were last year.
Pjotr Prins transcribed 1.8K bytes:
> Just to clarify, we will organize a two day Guix conference before
> FOSDEM. That is pretty much in the box. We have room at ICAB, the place
> we were last year.
>
> http://icab.be/
Is this directly before fosdem? I'd like to join this time if my
schedule
Nils Gillmann writes:
> Pjotr Prins transcribed 1.8K bytes:
>> Just to clarify, we will organize a two day Guix conference before
>> FOSDEM. That is pretty much in the box. We have room at ICAB, the place
>> we were last year.
>>
>> http://icab.be/
>
> Is this directly before fosdem? I'd li
Speaking from a user-perspective, I would be very much in favour of
having modern Firefox and Chromium (appropriately de-Googled as much as
possible, of course) as actual Guix offerings.
And while there are lots of objectionable things about the www in 2018,
I don't think being a GNU follower is l
Hi,
> On 2018-08-30 20:20, Pjotr Prins wrote:
>> Just to clarify, we will organize a two day Guix conference before
>> FOSDEM. That is pretty much in the box. We have room at ICAB, the place
>> we were last year.
>>
>> http://icab.be/
>
> About the specifically guix event, maybe it's a good ti
Gábor Boskovits writes:
> George Clemmer ezt írta (időpont: 2018. aug. 30., Cs,
> 21:14):
>
>>
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>
>> > Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I think “Guix System” is OK.
>> >
>> > I think so too.
>>
>> I recommend against renaming GuixSD >> "Guix Sys
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 02:41:04PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I would like to keep the number of talks to a minimum and leave out
> introductory talks completely (that would be more suited for a general
> FOSDEM audience). Instead I’d like to see more active
> self-organisation.
>
> What do y
Hello,
I was refraining to answer, but this:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:29 PM George Clemmer wrote:
> I think this discussion was primarily triggered by the realization that
> we can improve the top-level presentation of Guix by downplaying the
> distinction between Guix and GuixSD. In fact, we c
> > >If we want an
> > improved label for the Guix system distribution, the best one is
> > probably "GuixOS" since "OS" is a widely used and recognized
> > abbreviation ...
>
> Is exactly my opinion also, so it gets a +1
>
Top 3:
1) GuixOS
2) Guix
3) Guix System
We have been working on the wip-bootstrap branch with the aim to remove
bootstrap binary seeds. At the moment this is for i686-linux only.
The first step was to build binutils-mesboot-2.20.1a,
glibc-mesboot-2.2.5 and gcc-mesboot-4.7.4 without the use of any binary
binutils, glibc or gcc.
The sec
Am 31.08.2018 um 01:38 schrieb Benjamin Slade:
> Speaking from a user-perspective, I would be very much in favour of
> having modern Firefox and Chromium (appropriately de-Googled as much as
> possible, of course) as actual Guix offerings.
+1 (I know, building Firefox is very, very tremulous. Thus
On 2018-08-31 11:35, Pjotr Prins wrote:
Thanks Amirouche,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:38:56PM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
On 2018-08-30 20:20, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> Just to clarify, we will organize a two day Guix conference before
> FOSDEM. That is pretty much in the box. We have room at IC
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 07:40:35PM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> > How about a dev-room for 'fun freedom programming languages'. It may get
> > a
> > white space talk. Then, if I think of the work on MES and Guix it may
> > not be that great a fit. My point is that we should name the room that
13 matches
Mail list logo
