Hello,
Björn Höfling skribis:
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 20:02:23 +
> Nils Gillmann wrote:
>
>> The patches would apply nowhere then, I'm sending a tarball of the
>> work. You can ignore the AGPL3 header, it's my default and for what I
>> upstream I relicense.
>>
>> This is Thunderbird 52.6.0, I
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Nils Gillmann writes:
[...]
>> Can you tell me why it is safer to say perl-license instead of
>> package-license perl?
>
> Following Ludo’s reference to “(guix licenses)” we can see this comment:
>
> ;; The license of Perl, GPLv1+ or Artistic (we ignore the latter
Hello Guix,
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:33:22PM -0700, Joshua Branson wrote:
>> So this isn't an april fools joke? guixSD may move to systemd?
>
> It was a joke :)
Indeed!
That said, if the package can be of any use, I don’t have any objections
to its inclusion, especia
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> Hello,
>
> Björn Höfling skribis:
>
> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 20:02:23 +
> > Nils Gillmann wrote:
> >
> >> The patches would apply nowhere then, I'm sending a tarball of the
> >> work. You can ignore the AGPL3 header, it's my default and for what I
> >
Hi Guix,
we have a bunch of packages that are used both as applications and as
Python libraries. An example is “deeptools”.
As a library we need to propagate other Python inputs; as an application
this is not necessary because we have wrappers.
I wonder how to deal with this. Should we assume
Am 04.04.2018 um 11:36 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> I wonder how to deal with this. Should we assume that these packages
> are used as libraries and default to propagating all Python inputs? Or
> should we have package variants (or outputs?) that propagate inputs as a
> side-effect?
If this is a "p
On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 10:38 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 11:42:16AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi and welcome to the Guix community...
Thanks!
> > Seeing this on April 1st I really hope it is a joke. If not I'm not
> > ever going to support GNU software or a
Hi,
> And the same happens again: He does not condemn systemd, calling it Free
> Software due to the GPL license. In my opinion systemd is violating one of
> the 4
> freeedoms of GPL: Freedom 1 (as well as the *NIX and KISS philosophy)
> * The freedom to study how the program works, and cha
Sorry, I'm not subscribed to this list. Hopefully this reply comes in correct
thread order.
> Hi,
>
> > And the same happens again: He does not condemn systemd, calling it Free
> > Software due to the GPL license. In my opinion systemd is violating one of
> > the 4
> > freeedoms of GPL: Freedom
I have to say I also thought you maybe implied what Martin wrote.
I think you have some assumptions that I don't understand or have; There
definitely looks like some misunderstanding is afoot here.
Technically I find systemd to be abhorent, but I don't see how it violates
the four freedoms. Pleas
Hi Svante,
Svante Signell writes:
> And the same happens again: He does not condemn systemd, calling it Free
> Software due to the GPL license. In my opinion systemd is violating one of
> the 4
> freeedoms of GPL: Freedom 1 (as well as the *NIX and KISS philosophy)
> * The freedom to stud
Svante Signell writes:
> It's really time for a re-definition of Free Software, not only basing such
> definitions solely on the license at hand. It is also a matter of freedoms of
> the users of software.
The Free Software Definition is already expressed in terms of the
freedoms of the users of
Hi all,
I think that discussions about systemd, the stated or suspected
motivations of its developers, and how it relates to free software are
not really on-topic for this list.
For discussions of the implications for developers of GNU+Linux
distributions that are currently using systemd, and wh
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Am 04.04.2018 um 11:36 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
>> I wonder how to deal with this. Should we assume that these packages
>> are used as libraries and default to propagating all Python inputs? Or
>> should we have package variants (or outputs?) that propagate inputs as a
Memory might serve me wrong, but I think we had such a april's fool
in the last years before and it backfired equally *and* we agreed
on not doing it again?
Would be good if people had more sense for spotting sarcasm and
humor, but not everyone has this.
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 02:49:51PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
...
And the same happens again: He does not condemn systemd, calling it Free
Software due to the GPL license. In my opinion systemd is violating one of the 4
freeedoms of GPL: Freedom 1 (as well as the *NIX and KISS philosop
Nils Gillmann writes:
> Memory might serve me wrong, but I think we had such a april's fool
> in the last years before and it backfired equally *and* we agreed
> on not doing it again?
I don’t think this happened.
I only found one in 2014:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2014-
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 01:14:53 -0400
Mark H Weaver wrote:
> No promises, but I'll try to find time in the next few days to make an
> attempt at an Icedove package. As de-facto maintainer of the IceCat
> package in Guix, I suppose that I'm well-positioned to work on this,
> and I certainly agree th
Last night I was watching Rich Hickey's on Specs and deployment. It is
a very interesting talk in many ways, recommended. He talks about
tests at 1:02 into the talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyLBGkS5ICk
and he gave me a new insight which rang immediately true. He said:
what is the point
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 10:34:10 +0200
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Maybe one of you can post the current patch to guix-patches and people
> can then work from there? (There’s already a few WIP patches at
> https://bugs.gnu.org/guix-patches and I think it’s a fine way to let
> people know
2018-04-05 7:24 GMT+02:00 Pjotr Prins :
> Last night I was watching Rich Hickey's on Specs and deployment. It is
> a very interesting talk in many ways, recommended. He talks about
> tests at 1:02 into the talk:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyLBGkS5ICk
>
> and he gave me a new insight whi
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 07:24:39 +0200
Pjotr Prins wrote:
> Last night I was watching Rich Hickey's on Specs and deployment. It is
> a very interesting talk in many ways, recommended. He talks about
> tests at 1:02 into the talk:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyLBGkS5ICk
>
> and he gave me a
22 matches
Mail list logo
