Hartmut Goebel <h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com> writes: > Am 04.04.2018 um 11:36 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >> I wonder how to deal with this. Should we assume that these packages >> are used as libraries and default to propagating all Python inputs? Or >> should we have package variants (or outputs?) that propagate inputs as a >> side-effect? > > If this is a "pure" application, I'd install it with*out* propagated > inputs. This might not be easy to determine, though.
It is both. It is often used just as an application, but the procedures that make up the application are just as often used in an interactive Python session or as a library. > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-02/msg00456.html This is about wrapping (or not) using virtual envs. I don’t really see how this relates to this problem, but maybe I’m missing something obvious. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net
